Arizona v. California

Description

Bookmarks:

41 to 60 of 233 Objects

In collections

(41 - 60 of 233)

Pages

In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the California defendants : in three volumes : volume II.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-23T14:49:59.027Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: findings of fact and conclusions of law : in three volumes : volume III : findings and conclusions relating to specific projects, proposed severally by : A. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, for itself and the City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego; B. Palo Verde Irrigation District; C. Coachella Valley County Water District; D. Imperial Irrigation District, accompanied by a brief on behalf of that district.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-24T16:06:39.035Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al.: brief in support of exceptions of the United States, intervener, to the special master's report and recommended decree.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-24T18:37:40.41Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. state of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. state of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant: Arizona's legislative history of sections 4(a), 5 (1st paragraph), and 8 of the Boulder Canyon Project Act.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-24T18:53:41.618Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded: the State of Nevada's exceptions to the report of Special Master, Simon H. Rifkind, dated December 5, 1960; and the recommended decree included therein.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-24T19:38:47.834Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al.: reply brief for the United States.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-24T18:57:04.398Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al.: response of the United States to the motion on behalf of the Navajo tribe of Indians for leave to intervene.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-24T19:00:30.587Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded: answering brief for the State of Nevada, intervener.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-24T19:59:42.128Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded: reply brief for the State of Nevada, intervener.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-24T20:03:47.522Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1963 : no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Wate
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1963 : no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant, State of Utah, impleaded defendant: statement by Arizona on decree proposed by the United States.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-25T13:21:04.321Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1963, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1963, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties: decree of court : as submitted by Imperial Irrigation District.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-25T14:05:09.961Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1963, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1963, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants: petition of defendant the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for rehearing and argument in support of petition.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-25T13:48:02.318Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
Letter from Archibald Cox, Solicitor General, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, D.C. to Honorable John F. Davis, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C.
Letter from Archibald Cox, Solicitor General, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, D.C. to Honorable John F. Davis, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2021-11-03T19:12:52.393Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
Memorandum of the California Defendants in Reply to Memorandum of the United States Requesting a Pre-Trial Conference
Memorandum of the California Defendants in Reply to Memorandum of the United States Requesting a Pre-Trial Conference
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2021-11-03T20:40:15.207Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
Motion of Colter Water Project Ass'n, Inc. for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curaie
Motion of Colter Water Project Ass'n, Inc. for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curaie
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2021-11-03T19:23:39.384Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
Motion on Behalf of Navajo Tribe of Indians of the Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, for Leave to Intervene, Brief in Support Thereof, and Petition of Intervention
Motion on Behalf of Navajo Tribe of Indians of the Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, for Leave to Intervene, Brief in Support Thereof, and Petition of Intervention
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2021-11-03T20:56:28.708Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
Motion on Behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for Leave to File Petition to Intervene
Motion on Behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for Leave to File Petition to Intervene
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2021-11-03T19:18:52.746Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
New Mexico's Exceptions to the Report and Recommended Decree of the Special Master
New Mexico's Exceptions to the Report and Recommended Decree of the Special Master
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2021-11-03T20:48:27.821Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
No. ___, original, in the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1952 : State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Wat
No. ___, original, in the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1952 : State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California and County of San Diego, California, defendants: motion on behalf of the United States of America for leave to intervene and brief in support of motion.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-17T21:16:00.104Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
Oral Arguments on Defendants’ Motion to Join, as Parties, the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, Before George I. Haight, Special Master, Stenographic Transcript, Vol. 1
Oral Arguments on Defendants’ Motion to Join, as Parties, the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, Before George I. Haight, Special Master, Stenographic Transcript, Vol. 1
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2021-11-30T20:23:36.115Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif

Pages