Arizona v. California

Description

Bookmarks:

21 to 40 of 233 Objects

In collections

(21 - 40 of 233)

Pages

In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the Sate of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 4.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-19T19:11:06.485Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: interrogatories addressed to complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 1.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-22T18:15:06.277Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: interrogatories addressed to complainant, State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 1.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-10-30T16:43:31.764Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: comments on Arizona's proposed specification of issues : submitted by the California defendants.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-22T16:58:57.612Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: interrogatories addressed to the intervener, the United States of America, by the California defendants : set no. 1.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-19T15:17:32.936Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State of New Mexico, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: interrogatories addressed to complainant, State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 2.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-19T14:55:32.337Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants to strike certain exhibits introduced by the complainant, State of Arizona.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-10-30T16:57:28.799Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for production of document by the State of Arizona.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-19T16:18:56.574Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for production of documents by the United States of America.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-19T18:15:27.525Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: brief of the California defendants in response to objections by the United States to interrogatories : sets numbers 1 and 2 : and motion to require further answers.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-19T19:44:30.593Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for an order relating to rights of the parties to interview government officials and employees.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-19T15:52:25.343Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants to require further answers of the State of New Mexico to interrogatories, and brief of the California defendants in support thereof.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-19T18:08:24.294Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: memorandum re rule 43(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "Record of Excluded Evidence" : submitted by the California defendants.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-22T19:12:57.279Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties: before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: availability of Article III(b) waters for use in California: legislative history of section 4(a) of Boulder Canyon Project Act (limitation provision): bills, amendments, and debates in chronological order: 70th Cong., 1st & 2d Sess. (1927-1928): submitted by the California defendants.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-19T19:17:22.643Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Wat
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: brief relating to findings of fact and conclusions of law, Nevada : volume II.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-22T21:38:53.014Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Wat
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, Nevada : volume I.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-22T21:20:45.792Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: opening brief for Arizona.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-24T15:20:44.307Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: brief of the California defendants to accompany their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law : in two volumes : volume two : appendices.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-23T14:41:35.401Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: brief of the California defendants to accompany their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law : in two volumes : volume one.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-23T14:33:00.019Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the California defendants : in three volumes : volume I.
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Topics
Water rights -- Southwest, New
Created Date
2017-05-24T16:33:49.291Z
Library/Archive
info:fedora/islandora:arizcalif

Pages