You are here
Search results
(1 - 20 of 168)
Pages
- Title
- Publications
- Title
- Congressional Testimony
- Title
- Litigation
- Title
- Uncommon controversy: fishing rights of the Muckleshoot, Puyallup, and Nisqually Indians : a report prepared for the American Friends Service Committee
- Summary
- Book review published in the Maine Law Review, Vol. 23, No.1 (1971).
- Type
- Publications
- Title
- Speeches
- Title
- The ex-convict’s right to vote
- Summary
- Unsigned student note published in the Southern California Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 1 (1967).
- Year
- 1967
- Type
- Publications
- Publisher
- School of Law of the University of Southern California
- Place
- Los Angeles, Calif.
- Title
- L.V. Knudson, petitioner, v. The Superior Court of San Diego County, respondent; Dewey H. Bandy et al., real parties in interest: civ. no. 9370
- Summary
- Case summary: Petitioner filed a writ of mandate to require the appellate department of the Superior Court of San Diego County to hear and rule on appeals by petitioner from judgments issued in the absence of petitioner and his counsel. The Court of Appeal held the appeals were timely filed under Rule 123(b) of the California Rules of Court and the Superior Court's motion to dismiss the appeals due to untimely filing was improper.
- Year
- 1968
- Type
- Litigation
- Title
- In the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, State of California: no. 4 - civil 9370 : L.V. Knudson, petitioner vs. the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, respondent, and Dewey H. Bandy, individually and dba Bandy's Campsters, and Great American Insurance Company, a corporation, real parties in interest: points and authorities in opposition to petition for writ of mandate
- Summary
- Case summary: Petitioner filed a writ of mandate to require the appellate department of the Superior Court of San Diego County to hear and rule on appeals by petitioner from judgments issued in the absence of petitioner and his counsel. The Court of Appeal held the appeals were timely filed under Rule 123(b) of the California Rules of Court and the Superior Court's motion to dismiss the appeals due to untimely filing was improper.
- Year
- 1968
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- [Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps?]
- Place
- [San Diego, Calif.?]
- Title
- In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: no. 24306 : Alex Scholder, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated; Pala Band of Mission Indians and Rincon Band of Mission Indians, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, appellants, vs. United States of America; Department of the Interior; Bureau of Indian Affairs; Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior; Robert L. Bennett, Commissioner, Bureau of Indian Affairs; William E. Finale, Director, Sacramento Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs; and Jess T. Town, Field Representative, Riverside, California area field office, Bureau of Indian Affairs, appellees: appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California: opening brief of appellants
- Summary
- Case summary: Class action suit brought by individual Indians and Indian bands to stop the Secretary of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs from spending Pala Indian Irrigation Project funds for the benefit of a non-Indian owner of land situated within the Indian irrigation district. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the District Court's holding regarding spending of Indian irrigation project funds for benefit of non-Indian land owner within the project. The Court of Appeals reaffirmed the expenditure by the Secretary of Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairs was not an unconstitutional taking under applicable federal laws and remanded the Indian's claim as to the validity of reimbursement charges.
- Year
- 1969
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- California Indian Legal Services
- Place
- [Berkeley, Calif.?]
- Title
- Alex Scholder, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, plaintiffs, v. United States of America; Department of the Interior; Bureau of Indian Affairs; Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior; Robert L. Bennett, Commissioner, Bureau of Indian Affairs; William E. Finale, Director, Sacramento Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs; and Jess T. Town, Field Representative, Riverside, California area field office, Bureau of Indian Affairs, defendants: no. 68-224-S
- Summary
- Case summary: Class action suit brought by individual Indians and Indian bands to stop the Secretary of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs from spending Pala Indian Irrigation Project funds for the benefit of a non-Indian owner of land situated within the Indian irrigation district. The District Court denied plaintiffs' motion. The court held the expenditure was not an unconstitutional taking under applicable federal laws.
- Year
- 1969
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- West Pub. Co.
- Place
- St. Paul
- Title
- Alex Scholder, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Pala Band of Mission Indians and Rincon Band of Mission Indians, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, appellants, v. United States of America, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Robert L. Bennett, Commissioner, Bureau of Indian Affairs, William E. Finale, Director, Sacramento Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and Jess T. Town, Field Representative, Riverside, California area field office, Bureau of Indian Affairs, appellees: no. 24306
- Summary
- Case summary: Class action suit brought by individual Indians and Indian bands to stop the Secretary of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs from spending Pala Indian Irrigation Project funds for the benefit of a non-Indian owner of land situated within the Indian irrigation district. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the District Court's holding regarding spending of Indian irrigation project funds for benefit of non-Indian land owner within the project. The Court of Appeals reaffirmed the expenditure by the Secretary of Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairs was not an unconstitutional taking under applicable federal laws and remanded the Indian's claim as to the validity of reimbursement charges.
- Year
- 1970
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- West Pub. Co.
- Place
- St. Paul
- Title
- In the Supreme Court of the United States: October term, 1970 : no. [blank] : Alex Scholder, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated; Pala Band of Mission Indians and Rincon Band of Mission Indians, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, petitioners, v. United States of America; Department of the Interior; Bureau of Indian Affairs; Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior; Robert L. Bennett, Commissioner, Bureau of Indian Affairs; William E. Finale, Director, Sacramento Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs; and Jess T. Town, Field Representative, Riverside, California area field office, Bureau of Indian Affairs, respondents: petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Summary
- Case summary: Class action suit brought by individual Indians and Indian bands to stop the Secretary of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs from spending Pala Indian Irrigation Project funds for the benefit of a non-Indian owner of land situated within the Indian irrigation district. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the United States Court for the District of Southern California's holding regarding spending of Indian irrigation project funds for benefit of non-Indian land owner within the project. The Court of Appeals reaffirmed the expenditure by the Secretary of Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairs was not an unconstitutional taking under applicable federal laws and remanded the Indian's claim as to the validity of reimbursement charges. The United States Supreme Court ruled that use of Indian irrigation project funds for benefit of non-Indian land owner within project was allowable under applicable federal laws.
- Year
- 1970
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- [California Indian Legal Services?]
- Place
- [Berkeley, Calif.?]
- Title
- In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: the Agua Caliente Band of Mission Indians, by and through its tribal council, et al., appellants, v. The County of Riverside, a political subdivision of the state of California, appellee: appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California: brief of amicus curiae
- Summary
- Case summary: Possessory interest tax could be imposed on lesses of Indian land absent legislation demonstrating a congressional purpose to forbid imposition of tax.
- Year
- 1970
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- California Indian Legal Services
- Place
- Escondido, Calif.
- Title
- In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1970, no. 5912: Kathleen Ramos, a minor, by her mother Marcella Mason, as next friend; Marcella Mason, individually, and on behalf of three other minor children residing with her; and Della Morales, individually, appellants, vs. John C. Montgomery, individually, and as Director of the Department of Social Welfare of the State of California; and H. E. Detrich, individually, and as Director of the Department of Social Welfare for the County of San Diego, California, appellees: on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California: jurisdictional statement
- Summary
- Case summary: Supreme Court affirmed Federal Court's dismissal of a suit to compel State Welfare Department to make AFDC payments to natural parents equal to that given to foster parents.
- Year
- 1970
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- California Indian Legal Services
- Place
- [Berkeley, Calif.?]
- Title
- In the Supreme Court of the United States: no.70-78: Affiliated Ute Citizens of the State of Utah, et al., petitioners v. United States of America, respondent ; Anita Reyos, et al., petitioners v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A., United States of America, et al., respondents: motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae and brief of the Native American Rights Fund, as amicus curiae
- Summary
- Case summary: Under the Ute Termination Act, once Secretary of Interior issued proclamation of termination the United States no longer owed any trust duty or responsibility to the mixed blood members of the Ute Tribe.
- Year
- 1970
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- Byron S. Adams Press
- Place
- Washington, D. C.
- Title
- In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: no. 24156 : United States of America, appellee, vs. Alpine Land & Reservoir Company, et al., appellees, Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, appellent-applicant for intervention: appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of Nevada: appellant's petition for rehearing
- Summary
- Case summary: Court denies tribe's motion to intervene in action by the government to quiet title to rights to water for a federal reclamation project, and court later holds that water rights of federal reclamation project are not limited by virtue of state law or contracts between Secretary of Interior and project water users.
- Year
- 1970
- Type
- Litigation
- Title
- Kathleen Ramos, a minor, by her mother Marcella Mason, as next friend, Marcella Mason, individually, and on behalf of three other minor children residing with her, and Della Morales, individually, plaintiffs, v. John C. Montgomery, individually, and as director of the Department of Social Welfare of the State of California, and H.E. Detrich, individually, and as director of the Department of Social Welfare for the County of San Diego, California, defendants : no. 69-259-K
- Summary
- Case summary: Dismissal of suit to compel State Welfare Department to make AFDC payments to natural parents equal to that given to foster parents.
- Year
- 1970
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- West Pub. Co.
- Place
- St. Paul
- Title
- In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1971, no. 71-183: the Agua Caliente Band of Mission Indians, by and through its tribal council, and Dora Joyce Prieto, Priscilla Gonzales, Gloria Gillettee, Patrick Patencio and Lawrence Pierce, allottees, individually and in class action, on behalf of all allottees of allotted land on the Agua Caliente Band of Mission Indians reservation, petitioners, v. The County of Riverside, a political subdivision of the state of California, respondents: brief of Native American Rights Fund, California Indian Legal Services, Dinebeiina Nahiilna be Agaditahe, as amici curiae in support of the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Summary
- Case summary: Possessory interest tax could be imposed on lesses of Indian land absent legislation demonstrating a congressional purpose to forbid imposition of tax.
- Year
- 1971
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- Bradford Printing
- Place
- Denver, Colo.
- Title
- In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1971, no. 71-1031: Leonard Tonasket, appellant v. the State of Washington and the supervisor of the Tax Commission of the State of Washington, appellees: brief of Native American Rights Fund as amicus curiae in support of the appellant
- Summary
- Opinion: State which has assumed civil and criminal jurisdiction over Indian reservation has authority to tax retail sale of cigarettes by tribally-licensed Indian store to non-Indian.
- Year
- 1971
- Type
- Litigation
- Publisher
- Bradford Printing
- Place
- Denver