Arizona v. California

201 to 233 of 233 Objects
(201 - 233 of 233)

Pages

# Title Title cont'd Year Authors fgs_createdDate_dt
1 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, May 8, 1957, Thursday, May 9, 1957, Friday, May 10, 1957 (v. 15 [v. 47 – 48 – 49], pp. 7426-7918), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:38.005Z
2 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, May 13, 1957, Tuesday, May 14, 1957, Wednesday, May 15, 1957 (v. 16 [v. 50 – 51 – 52], pp. 7919-8405), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:39.687Z
3 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, May 16, 1957, Friday, May 17, 1957, Monday, July 1, 1957 (v. 17 [v. 53 – 54 – 55], pp. 8406-8894), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:41.087Z
4 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Saturday, July 6, 1957, Monday, July 8, 1957, Tuesday, July 9, 1957 (v. 19 [v. 59 – 60 – 61], pp. 9449-9929), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:44.223Z
5 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, February 11, 1957, Tuesday, February 12, 1957, Wednesday, February 13, 1957, Thursday, February 14, 1957 (v. 13 [v. 40 – 41 – 42 - 43], pp. 6304-6933), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:33.17Z
6 Reporters’ Transcript : Pre Trial Conference : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, April 10 - Friday, April 13, 1956, Arizona v. California, No. 10. Pre Trial Conference 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:06:42.436Z
7 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 18, 1957, Friday, July 19, 1957, Monday, August 5, 1957 (v. 22 [v. 68 – 69 – 70], pp. 11,015-11,509), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:51.176Z
8 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, July 15, 1957, Tuesday, July 16, 1957, Wednesday, July 17, 1957 (v. 21 [v. 65 – 66 – 67], pp. 10,500-11,014A), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:47.781Z
9 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, May 9, 1958, Monday, May 12, 1958, Tuesday, May 13, 1958 (v. 33 [v. 101 – 102 – 103], pp. 16,689-17,247), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:17.119Z
10 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, January 7, 1958, Wednesday, January 8, 1958, Thursday, January 9, 1958 (v. 28 [v. 86 – 87 – 88], pp. 14,126-14,661), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:06.522Z
11 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 22, 1957, Friday, August 23, 1957, Monday, January 6, 1958 (v. 27 [v. 83 – 84 – 85], pp. 13,611-14,125), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1957 & 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:02.397Z
12 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, August 19, 1957, Tuesday, August 20, 1957, Wednesday, August 21, 1957 (v. 26 [v. 80 – 81 – 82], pp. 13,145-13,610; Includes Conference of Tuesday, August 20, 1957), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:59.613Z
13 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, May 2, 1958, Saturday, May 3, 1958, Monday, May 5, 1958 (v. 31 [v. 95 – 96 – 97], pp. 15,639-16,167), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:13.242Z
14 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, January 10, 1958, Monday, January 13, 1958, Tuesday, January 14, 1958 (v. 29 [v. 89 – 90 – 91], pp. 14,662-15,177), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:10.04Z
15 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, May 6, 1958, Wednesday, May 7, 1958, Thursday, May 8, 1958 (v. 32 [v. 98 – 99 – 100], pp. 16,168-16,688), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:15.959Z
16 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, January 15, 1958, Thursday, January 16, 1958, Friday, January 17, 1958 (v. 30 [v. 92 – 93 – 94], pp. 15,178-15,638), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:11.828Z
17 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 9, 1957, Monday, August 12, 1957, Tuesday, August 13, 1957 (v. 24 [v. 74 – 75 – 76], pp. 12,072-12,603), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:54.402Z
18 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 6, 1957, Wednesday, August 7, 1957, Thursday, August 8, 1957 (v. 23 [v. 71 – 72 – 73], pp. 11,510-12,071), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:53.244Z
19 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, August 14, 1957, Thursday, August 15, 1957, Friday, August 16, 1957 (v. 25 [v. 77 – 78 – 79], pp. 12,604-13,144), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:57.257Z
20 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 14, 1958, Friday, August 15, 1958, Monday, August 18, 1958 (v. 40 [v. 122 – 123 – 124], pp. 20,514-21,106), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:28.925Z
21 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 19, 1958, Wednesday, August 20, 1958, Thursday, August 21, 1958 (v. 41 [v. 125 – 126 – 127], pp. 21,107-21,712), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:30.889Z
22 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, May 19, 1958, Tuesday, July 1, 1958, Wednesday, July 2, 1958 (v. 35 [v. 107 – 108 – 109], pp. 17,781-18,344), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:20.437Z
23 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 3, 1958, Monday, July 7, 1958, Tuesday, July 8, 1958 (v. 36 [v. 110 – 111 – 112], pp. 18,345-18,907), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:22.606Z
24 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Saturday, July 12, 1958, Monday, July 14, 1958, Tuesday, July 15, 1958 (v. 38 [v. 116 – 117 – 118], pp. 19,428-19,986), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:27.159Z
25 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, May 14, 1958, Thursday, May 15, 1958, Friday, May 16, 1958 (v. 34 [v. 104 – 105 – 106], pp. 17,248-17,780), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:18.799Z
26 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, July 9, 1958, Thursday, July 10, 1958, Friday, July 11, 1958 (v. 37 [v. 113 – 114 – 115], pp. 18,908-19,427), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:24.601Z
27 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 22, 1958, Tuesday, August 26, 1958 (v. 42 [v. 128 – 129], pp. 21,713-22,113), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:32.793Z
28 Transcripts of Special Proceedings : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : 1. Oral Argument : Joinder Motion : Dec. 8, 1955 -- 2. Minutes, New York Meeting : Jan. 30, 1956 -- 3. Discussion of Pre-trial Order : April 21, 1956, Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, 1955 Term. Part A. Offer of Proof and Argument 1960-08-17 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Southern District Court Reporters, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:36.169Z
29 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, August 27, 1958, Thursday, August 28, 1958 (v. 43 [v. 130 – 131], pp. 22,114-22,593), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:34.303Z
30 Transcripts of Special Proceedings : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : 1. Oral Argument : Joinder Motion : Dec. 8, 1955 -- 2. Minutes, New York Meeting : Jan. 30, 1956 -- 3. Discussion of Pre-trial Order : April 21, 1956, Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, 1955 Term Part B. Recommended Decree Conferences 1960-08-19 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Southern District Court Reporters, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:37.51Z
31 Oral Arguments on Defendants’ Motion to Join, as Parties, the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, Before George I. Haight, Special Master, Stenographic Transcript, Vol. 1 1955-07-18 Haight, George I., California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener 2021-11-30T20:23:36.115Z
32 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States of America. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T16:32:49.674Z
33 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master findings of fact and conclusions of law : in three volumes : volume III : findings and conclusions relating to specific projects, proposed severally by : A. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, for itself and the City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego; B. Palo Verde Irrigation District; C. Coachella Valley County Water District; D. Imperial Irrigation District, accompanied by a brief on behalf of that district. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T16:06:39.035Z

Pages