Arizona v. California

1 to 200 of 233 Objects
(1 - 200 of 233)

Pages

# Title Title cont'd Year Authors fgs_createdDate_dt
1 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : Colorado River Indian Tribes ... [et al.], recommended interveners Elbert P. Tuttle, special master : report. 1982 Arizona, complainant, Tuttle, Elbert P. (Elbert Parr), 1897-1996, special master, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and California, recommended intervenver, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T14:10:57.798Z
2 Arizona v. California et al. : no. 8, original : Decree carrying into effect this Court’s opinion of June 3, 1963, 373 U.S. 546. 1964 United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T14:07:19.371Z
3 Arizona v. California et al. : on exceptions to special master's report and recommended decree : no. 8, original. 1963 United States. Supreme Court, Arizona, complainant, California, defendant 2017-05-25T13:35:06.3Z
4 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al. memorandum of the United States respecting certain proposals for inclusion in decree. 1963 Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T13:57:43.198Z
5 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1963, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties decree of court : as submitted by Imperial Irrigation District. 1963 Arizona, complainant, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Carter, James, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T14:05:09.961Z
6 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants proposals for articles I(G), (H), II(B)(2), II(B)(4), II(B)(7) of decree : submitted by State of California : in which join the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Coachella Valley County Water District, and Palo Verde Irrigation District : December 18, 1963. 1963 Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Muys, Jerome C, Mann, Roy H, Redwine, Earl, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Lauten, John H, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Howard, James H, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Firestone, Alan M, McLees, Bertram, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T13:44:03.147Z
7 [State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : States of Utah and New Mexico, impleaded defendants Order denying petitions for rehearing] 1963 Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T14:01:53.054Z
8 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties supplement and amendment to Imperial Irrigation District's form of "decree of court" as heretofore and herewith submitted. 1963 Arizona, complainant, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Carter, James H, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T13:32:17.709Z
9 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1963 : no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant, State of Utah, impleaded defendant statement by Arizona on decree proposed by the United States. 1963 Arizona, complainant, Salmon, Riney B, Wilmer, Mark, Sutter, Burr, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T13:21:04.321Z
10 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded intervener State of Nevada's comments on proposed decree. 1963 Arizona, complainant, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T13:39:00.934Z
11 In the Supreme Court of the United States, no. 8 original, October term 1963 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : States of Utah and New Mexico, impleaded defendants petition of Imperial Irrigation District for rehearing : with supporting material. 1963 Arizona, complainant, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Carter, James, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T13:54:28.194Z
12 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants petition for rehearing : submitted by State of California : in which join the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Coachella Valley County Water District, and Palo Verde Irrigation District : September 16, 1963. 1963 Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Muys, Jerome C, Mann, Roy H, Redwine, Earl, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Lauten, John H, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Howard, James H, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Firestone, Alan M, McLees, Bertram, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T13:28:11.511Z
13 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1963, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants petition of defendant the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for rehearing and argument in support of petition. 1963 Arizona, complainant, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Lauten, John H, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Howard, James H, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T13:48:02.318Z
14 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al. agreed provisions for proposed final decree. 1963 Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T13:50:41.966Z
15 Affadavit of Services 1962-06-15 Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, Nevada, Intervener, Utah, Impleaded Defendant, New Mexico, Impleaded Defendant, Rifkind, Simon H. 2021-11-03T20:51:18.218Z
16 Letter from Archibald Cox, Solicitor General, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, D.C. to Honorable John F. Davis, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 1962-01-29 Cox, Archibald, Davis, John F. 2021-11-03T19:12:52.393Z
17 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded [transcript of arguments] 1962 Arizona, Complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Wilmer, Mark, Reed, Charles H, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Parry, R. P., McCarthy, Dennis, Hartley, Earl, Mann, Claud S, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-25T16:07:44.139Z
18 Motion on Behalf of Navajo Tribe of Indians of the Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, for Leave to Intervene, Brief in Support Thereof, and Petition of Intervention 1961-09-25 Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, Nevada, Intervener, Utah, Impleaded Defendant, New Mexico, Impleaded Defendant, Kirgis, Frederic L., Littell, Norman M., McPherson, Joseph F. 2021-11-03T20:56:28.708Z
19 Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Recommended Decree on File Herein, Dated December 5, 1960, Filed by Defendant, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, on Its Behalf and on Behalf of Its Co-Defendants, The City of Los Angeles, and Its Department of Water and Power, The City of San Diego, and The County of San Diego 1961-02-27 Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, Nevada, Intervener, New Mexico, Party, Utah, Party, Howard, James H., Special Counsel, Cooper, Charles C. Jr., Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P. 2021-11-03T20:45:13.497Z
20 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant opening brief for Arizona / Chas. H. Reed, chief counsel ... [et al.] 1961 Arizona, complainant, Reed, Charles H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Udall, Calvin H, Will, John Geoffrey, Roberts, W. H, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T18:45:00.052Z
21 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded the State of Nevada's exceptions to the report of Special Master, Simon H. Rifkind, dated December 5, 1960; and the recommended decree included therein. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:38:47.834Z
22 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant reply brief for Arizona. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Udall, Calvin H, Will, John Geoffrey, Roberts, W. H, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:14:50.175Z
23 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al. brief in support of exceptions of the United States, intervener, to the special master's report and recommended decree. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Davis, John F, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T18:37:40.41Z
24 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al. reply brief for the United States. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Davis, John F, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T18:57:04.398Z
25 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants reply brief of the California defendants to the answering briefs of the United States, Arizona, and Nevada. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Nelson, Gilbert F, Alexander, John R, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Firestone, Alan M, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:34:52.953Z
26 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded answering brief for the State of Nevada, intervener. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:59:42.128Z
27 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al. exceptions of the United States, intervener, to the special master's report and recommended decree. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant;, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T18:40:21.666Z
28 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener: State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant answering brief for Arizona. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Udall, Calvin H, Will, John Geoffrey, Roberts, W. H, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:05:55.785Z
29 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants answering brief of the California defendants to the exceptions and opening briefs of the United States, Arizona, and Nevada. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Nelson, Gilbert F, Alexander, John R, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Firestone, Alan M, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:28:25.474Z
30 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded opening brief for the state of Nevada, intervener 1961 Arizona, complainant, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:45:51.16Z
31 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al. answering brief of the United States. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Davis, John F, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T18:48:26.597Z
32 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants closing brief of Imperial Irrigation District. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Knox, R. L, Horton, Harry W, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:10:09.946Z
33 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded Arizona's motion for adoption, with exceptions, of the special master's report and recommended decree. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Udall, Calvin H, Will, John Geoffrey, Roberts, W. H, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T20:18:40.449Z
34 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded reply brief for the State of Nevada, intervener. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T20:03:47.522Z
35 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants opening brief of the California defendants in support of their exceptions to the report of the special master. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Nelson, Gilbert F, Alexander, John R, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:21:29.206Z
36 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. state of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant Arizona's legislative history of sections 4(a), 5 (1st paragraph), and 8 of the Boulder Canyon Project Act. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Reed, Charles H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Udall, Calvin H, Will, John Geoffrey, Roberts, W. H, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court, Arizona. Legislature 2017-05-24T18:53:41.618Z
37 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al. response of the United States to the motion on behalf of the Navajo tribe of Indians for leave to intervene. 1961 Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:00:30.587Z
38 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants legislative history appendixes accompanying the reply brief of the California defendants to the answering briefs of the United States, Arizona, and Nevada. 1961 Arizona, complainant, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T19:42:08.875Z
39 New Mexico's Exceptions to the Report and Recommended Decree of the Special Master 1960-12-05 Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, Nevada, Intervener, Utah, Impleaded Defendant, New Mexico, Impleaded Defendant 2021-11-03T20:48:27.821Z
40 Transcripts of Special Proceedings : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : 1. Oral Argument : Joinder Motion : Dec. 8, 1955 -- 2. Minutes, New York Meeting : Jan. 30, 1956 -- 3. Discussion of Pre-trial Order : April 21, 1956, Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, 1955 Term Part B. Recommended Decree Conferences 1960-08-19 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Southern District Court Reporters, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:37.51Z
41 Transcript of New York Hearings, New York, NY, August 17, 1960 (Southern District Court Reporters), Before Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: Stenographer’s Minutes Parts A. Offer of proof and argument; and B. Recommended decree conferences 1960-08-17 State of California, Defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, State of Nevada, Intervener, State of New Mexico, Party, State of Utah, Party 2021-12-06T16:36:03.298Z
42 Transcripts of Special Proceedings : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : 1. Oral Argument : Joinder Motion : Dec. 8, 1955 -- 2. Minutes, New York Meeting : Jan. 30, 1956 -- 3. Discussion of Pre-trial Order : April 21, 1956, Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, 1955 Term. Part A. Offer of Proof and Argument 1960-08-17 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Southern District Court Reporters, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:36.169Z
43 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants Simon H. Rifkind, special master : report. 1960 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico,impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T18:00:24.926Z
44 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master offer of proof and brief in support of offer : submitted by the California defendants, August 17, 1960, New York City, New York. 1960 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T18:28:41.86Z
45 Water supply of the Lower Colorado River Basin : extracts from brief and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, submitted April 1, 1959, to Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master, by the California defendants and excerpts from the evidence, Arizona v. California, no. 9 original October 1959 term. 1960 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T16:59:01.456Z
46 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master motion to reopen the trial for the taking of evidence re depletion of the Colorado River at Lee Ferry by the Upper Basin, and statement in support of motion 1960 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T17:55:48.889Z
47 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master Arizona's comments on the draft report and recommended decree. 1960 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T16:42:03.809Z
48 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master comments, suggestions, and motions of the California defendants re the Special Master's Draft report, dated May 5, 1960. 1960 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Alexander, John R, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Jenney, Francis, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T17:09:28.397Z
49 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master comments of the State of Nevada on draft report of special master, dated May 5, 1960. 1960 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T18:09:33.833Z
50 Upper Colorado River Commission summary : no. 9 original, in the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1959 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and the State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants Simon H. Rifkind, special master : draft report [summary] 1960 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Upper Colorado River Commission, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T17:13:57.514Z
51 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants exceptions of the California defendants to the report of the special master. 1960 Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Malkan, Gerald, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T18:06:14.776Z
52 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants Simon H. Rifkind, special master : draft report 1960 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T17:02:16.739Z
53 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master New Mexico's comments on the special master's report, May 5, 1960. 1960 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Dickson, Hilton A., Jr, Olson, Thomas O, Mann, Claud S, Cornell, Dudley, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T18:32:42.899Z
54 Arizona v. California : no. 9 original, October 1959 term offer of proof : table of contents, text of documents submitted by California defendants. 1960 Arizona, complainant, California, defendant 2017-05-24T16:50:26.586Z
55 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master Arizona's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T15:51:38.219Z
56 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master reply brief of the United States of America. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Rankin, J. Lee, Morton, Perry W, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T16:10:36.229Z
57 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master New Mexico's objections to certain requested findings of fact and conclusions of law of Arizona, California, Nevada and the United States. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Zinn, Frank B, Olson, Thomas O, Mann, Claud S, Billhymer, Paul L, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T15:54:40.066Z
58 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master New Mexico's requested findings of facts and conclusions of law. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Zinn, Frank B, Billhymer, Paul L, Moise, Irwin S, Mann, Claud S, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T15:26:18.652Z
59 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master Arizona's answering brief. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant;, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T16:14:41.809Z
60 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master Arizona's objections to findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by other parties. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T14:37:38.79Z
61 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master New Mexico's brief in support of its requested findings of fact and conclusions of law. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Zinn, Frank B, Billhymer, Paul L, Moise, Irwin S, Mann, Claud S, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T14:41:13.021Z
62 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master supplemental and alternative findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the California defendants : proposed jointly by the State of California and other California defendants. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T15:58:30.933Z
63 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties: before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master supplemental rebuttal brief of defendant Imperial Irrigation District. 1959 Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Horton, Harry W, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party 2017-05-23T16:00:58.57Z
64 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master brief in support of findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the United States of America. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Rankin, J. Lee, Morton, Perry W, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T14:51:18.357Z
65 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master supplementary brief submitted on behalf of defendant the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Du Paul, J. F, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T16:19:35.98Z
66 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the United States of America. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Rankin, J. Lee, Morton, Perry W, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T15:39:50.612Z
67 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and brief relating thereto of the State of Nevada. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T14:21:09.439Z
68 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master rebuttal brief of the United States of America. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Rankin, J. Lee, Morton, Perry W, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, Wise, Warren R, Luellman, Charles G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T16:37:31.203Z
69 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master response of the California defendants to brief in support of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States of America. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T14:28:33.264Z
70 State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master New Mexico's rebuttal brief. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Zinn, Frank B, Olson, Thomas O, Mann, Claud S, Billhymer, Paul L, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T15:58:01.216Z
71 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master brief of the California defendants to accompany their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law : in two volumes : volume two : appendices. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T14:41:35.401Z
72 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master brief of the California defendants to accompany their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law : in two volumes : volume one. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T14:33:00.019Z
73 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master reply brief of the State of Nevada. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Dunseath, William N, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T15:51:08.189Z
74 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master response of the California defendants to requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, and brief in support thereof of the State of New Mexico. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T14:47:27.919Z
75 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the California defendants : in three volumes : volume I. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant;, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T16:33:49.291Z
76 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the State of Utah. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T15:36:18.585Z
77 United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master Arizona special appendix : the detailed bases for Arizona's objections to New Mexico's proposed findings and conclusions relating to "present uses" and "future uses" in New Mexico : to accompany Arizona's answering brief. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant 2017-05-23T15:17:33.41Z
78 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the California defendants : in three volumes : volume II. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T14:49:59.027Z
79 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and opening brief of the State of Arizona. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T16:16:45.902Z
80 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master answering brief of the State of Nevada. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Dunseath, William N, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T15:27:38.676Z
81 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master rebuttal brief of the California defendants. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T15:35:16.14Z
82 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States of America. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-23T16:32:49.674Z
83 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master findings of fact and conclusions of law : in three volumes : volume III : findings and conclusions relating to specific projects, proposed severally by : A. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, for itself and the City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego; B. Palo Verde Irrigation District; C. Coachella Valley County Water District; D. Imperial Irrigation District, accompanied by a brief on behalf of that district. 1959 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T16:06:39.035Z
84 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master opening statement on behalf of the intervening State of Nevada. 1958 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T20:13:28.659Z
85 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master opening brief for Arizona. 1958 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-24T15:20:44.307Z
86 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master brief relating to findings of fact and conclusions of law, Nevada : volume II. 1958 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Dunseath, W. N, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T21:38:53.014Z
87 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, Nevada : volume I. 1958 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Dunseath, W. N, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T21:20:45.792Z
88 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, May 9, 1958, Monday, May 12, 1958, Tuesday, May 13, 1958 (v. 33 [v. 101 – 102 – 103], pp. 16,689-17,247), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:17.119Z
89 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, January 7, 1958, Wednesday, January 8, 1958, Thursday, January 9, 1958 (v. 28 [v. 86 – 87 – 88], pp. 14,126-14,661), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:06.522Z
90 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, May 2, 1958, Saturday, May 3, 1958, Monday, May 5, 1958 (v. 31 [v. 95 – 96 – 97], pp. 15,639-16,167), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:13.242Z
91 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, January 10, 1958, Monday, January 13, 1958, Tuesday, January 14, 1958 (v. 29 [v. 89 – 90 – 91], pp. 14,662-15,177), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:10.04Z
92 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, May 6, 1958, Wednesday, May 7, 1958, Thursday, May 8, 1958 (v. 32 [v. 98 – 99 – 100], pp. 16,168-16,688), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:15.959Z
93 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, January 15, 1958, Thursday, January 16, 1958, Friday, January 17, 1958 (v. 30 [v. 92 – 93 – 94], pp. 15,178-15,638), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:11.828Z
94 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 14, 1958, Friday, August 15, 1958, Monday, August 18, 1958 (v. 40 [v. 122 – 123 – 124], pp. 20,514-21,106), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:28.925Z
95 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 19, 1958, Wednesday, August 20, 1958, Thursday, August 21, 1958 (v. 41 [v. 125 – 126 – 127], pp. 21,107-21,712), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:30.889Z
96 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, May 19, 1958, Tuesday, July 1, 1958, Wednesday, July 2, 1958 (v. 35 [v. 107 – 108 – 109], pp. 17,781-18,344), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:20.437Z
97 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 3, 1958, Monday, July 7, 1958, Tuesday, July 8, 1958 (v. 36 [v. 110 – 111 – 112], pp. 18,345-18,907), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:22.606Z
98 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Saturday, July 12, 1958, Monday, July 14, 1958, Tuesday, July 15, 1958 (v. 38 [v. 116 – 117 – 118], pp. 19,428-19,986), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:27.159Z
99 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, May 14, 1958, Thursday, May 15, 1958, Friday, May 16, 1958 (v. 34 [v. 104 – 105 – 106], pp. 17,248-17,780), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:18.799Z
100 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, July 9, 1958, Thursday, July 10, 1958, Friday, July 11, 1958 (v. 37 [v. 113 – 114 – 115], pp. 18,908-19,427), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:24.601Z
101 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 22, 1958, Tuesday, August 26, 1958 (v. 42 [v. 128 – 129], pp. 21,713-22,113), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:32.793Z
102 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, August 27, 1958, Thursday, August 28, 1958 (v. 43 [v. 130 – 131], pp. 22,114-22,593), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:34.303Z
103 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 22, 1957, Friday, August 23, 1957, Monday, January 6, 1958 (v. 27 [v. 83 – 84 – 85], pp. 13,611-14,125), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1957 & 1958 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:35:02.397Z
104 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, intervenors : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master reply brief of the State of Utah to findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and the United States. 1957 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Callister, E. R, McCarthy, Dennis, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T20:05:08.165Z
105 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the State of Utah. 1957 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Callister, E. R, McCarthy, Dennis, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T19:16:55.878Z
106 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master rebuttal brief of the State of Utah. 1957 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court, Budge, Walter L, McCarthy, Dennis 2017-05-22T20:09:33.29Z
107 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded amended bill of complaint. 1957 Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T19:28:50.259Z
108 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master amended and supplemental statement of position by complainant, State of Arizona. 1957 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Reed, Charles H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T19:42:48.766Z
109 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded complainant's amended reply to California defendants' answer. 1957 Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T19:52:07.071Z
110 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded complainant's motion for leave to file amended pleadings. 1957 Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T19:20:25.565Z
111 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded complainant's amended response to complaint and answer in intervention by the State of Utah. 1957 Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T19:24:30.57Z
112 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded amended answer to petition of intervention on behalf of the State of Nevada. 1957 Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T19:33:53.974Z
113 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded complainant's amended response to appearance and statement of New Mexico. 1957 Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T19:47:26.704Z
114 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, July 2, 1957, Wednesday, July 3, 1957, Friday, July 5, 1957 (v. 18 [v. 56 – 57 – 58], pp. 8895-9448), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:42.471Z
115 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, July 10, 1957, Thursday, July 11, 1957, Friday, July 12, 1957 (v. 20 [v. 62 – 63 – 64], pp. 9930-10,499), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:45.907Z
116 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, February 15, 1957, Monday, May 6, 1957, Tuesday, May 7, 1957 (v. 14 [v. 44 – 45 – 46], pp. 6934-7425), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:35.397Z
117 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, May 8, 1957, Thursday, May 9, 1957, Friday, May 10, 1957 (v. 15 [v. 47 – 48 – 49], pp. 7426-7918), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:38.005Z
118 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, May 13, 1957, Tuesday, May 14, 1957, Wednesday, May 15, 1957 (v. 16 [v. 50 – 51 – 52], pp. 7919-8405), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:39.687Z
119 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, May 16, 1957, Friday, May 17, 1957, Monday, July 1, 1957 (v. 17 [v. 53 – 54 – 55], pp. 8406-8894), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:41.087Z
120 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Saturday, July 6, 1957, Monday, July 8, 1957, Tuesday, July 9, 1957 (v. 19 [v. 59 – 60 – 61], pp. 9449-9929), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:44.223Z
121 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, February 11, 1957, Tuesday, February 12, 1957, Wednesday, February 13, 1957, Thursday, February 14, 1957 (v. 13 [v. 40 – 41 – 42 - 43], pp. 6304-6933), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:33.17Z
122 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 18, 1957, Friday, July 19, 1957, Monday, August 5, 1957 (v. 22 [v. 68 – 69 – 70], pp. 11,015-11,509), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:51.176Z
123 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, July 15, 1957, Tuesday, July 16, 1957, Wednesday, July 17, 1957 (v. 21 [v. 65 – 66 – 67], pp. 10,500-11,014A), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:47.781Z
124 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, August 19, 1957, Tuesday, August 20, 1957, Wednesday, August 21, 1957 (v. 26 [v. 80 – 81 – 82], pp. 13,145-13,610; Includes Conference of Tuesday, August 20, 1957), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:59.613Z
125 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 9, 1957, Monday, August 12, 1957, Tuesday, August 13, 1957 (v. 24 [v. 74 – 75 – 76], pp. 12,072-12,603), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:54.402Z
126 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 6, 1957, Wednesday, August 7, 1957, Thursday, August 8, 1957 (v. 23 [v. 71 – 72 – 73], pp. 11,510-12,071), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:53.244Z
127 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, August 14, 1957, Thursday, August 15, 1957, Friday, August 16, 1957 (v. 25 [v. 77 – 78 – 79], pp. 12,604-13,144), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1957 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T17:34:57.257Z
128 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party answer of California defendants to appearance and statement in behalf of New Mexico of its claim of interest in and to Lower Basin waters, and : interrogatories addressed to the State of New Mexico by the California defendants. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T16:58:01.773Z
129 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master interrogatories addressed to the intervener, the United States of America, by the California defendants : set no. 2. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T16:05:15.732Z
130 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master interrogatories addressed to the intervener, the State of Nevada, by the California defendants. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T16:26:29.375Z
131 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master opening statement on behalf of the State of Utah. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T16:49:48.402Z
132 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master answers of the State of Arizona to interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants, set no. 1. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Moeur, John H, Frank, John P. (John Paul), 1917-2002, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T18:26:29.134Z
133 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master statement of the issues as submitted by the California defendants for the Pre-trial Conference at San Francisco April 10-13, 1956. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States. Supreme Court, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party 2017-05-19T16:43:57.18Z
134 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master notice of supplemental motion, and supplemental motion of the California defendants to strike certain exhibits introduced by the complainant, State of Arizona. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T17:08:29.987Z
135 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties: before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master availability of Article III(b) waters for use in California: legislative history of section 4(a) of Boulder Canyon Project Act (limitation provision): bills, amendments, and debates in chronological order: 70th Cong., 1st & 2d Sess. (1927-1928): submitted by the California defendants. 1956 Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court, New Mexico, party, Utah, party 2017-05-19T19:17:22.643Z
136 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master memorandum of the California defendants in clarification of interrogatories to the United States : and resubmitted interrogatories. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T16:56:00.658Z
137 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : States of New Mexico and Utah, impleaded statement of position of New Mexico. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Robinson, Richard H, Wilson, Fred E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T18:58:45.162Z
138 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the Sate of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 4. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T19:11:06.485Z
139 State of Arizona, complainant vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master interrogatories addressed to the complainant, State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 3. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T18:38:03.781Z
140 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master interrogatories addressed to complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 1. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T18:15:06.277Z
141 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master interrogatories addressed to complainant, State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 1. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-10-30T16:43:31.764Z
142 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master comments on Arizona's proposed specification of issues : submitted by the California defendants. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T16:58:57.612Z
143 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties memorandum of April 9, 1956 concerning statement of issues : statement of position of Arizona. 1956 Arizona, complainant, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T15:05:53.536Z
144 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, intervener : State of Utah, intervener answer of the State of Nevada to complaint and answer in intervention by the State of Utah. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Kane, William J, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, intervener, Utah, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T17:55:09.012Z
145 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master answers of the State of Arizona to interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants, set no. 2. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Moeur, John H, Frank, John P, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, Akin, Wayne M, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.),| efendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court, Arizona Interstate Stream Commission 2017-05-19T14:47:46.331Z
146 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master answers of the State of New Mexico to interrogatories addressed to the State of New Mexico by the California defendants. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Robinson, Richard H, Wilson, Fred E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T20:45:50.149Z
147 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master pre-trial order. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T15:09:32.189Z
148 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party answer of the State of Nevada to the appearance and statement in behalf of New Mexico of its claim of interest in and to Lower Basin waters. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Kane, William J, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T18:19:13.186Z
149 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master response of the state of New Mexico to the motion of the California defendants to require further answers of the state of New Mexico to interrogatories and answer to brief of California defendants in support thereof. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Wilson, Fred E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T19:21:07.838Z
150 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master interrogatories addressed to the intervener, the United States of America, by the California defendants : set no. 1. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H.|q(Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G.|q(Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt,|d1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T15:17:32.936Z
151 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party statement of the State of Nevada. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Kane, William J, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T16:12:38.34Z
152 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State of New Mexico, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master interrogatories addressed to complainant, State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 2. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T14:55:32.337Z
153 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master order of special master. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party 2017-05-19T18:29:54.693Z
154 State of Arizona, plaintiff, vs. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener complaint and answer in intervention by the State of Utah. 1956 Arizona, plaintiff, Callister, E. R, McCarthy, Dennis, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T19:01:54.681Z
155 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants to strike certain exhibits introduced by the complainant, State of Arizona. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, 1901-1995; Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-10-30T16:57:28.799Z
156 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master memorandum of the California defendants in support of their motion of April 11, 1956, to require further answers of complainant, State of Arizona, to interrogatories, sets numbers 1 and 2. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T18:55:14.899Z
157 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [el al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State of New Mexico, party answers of the State of Utah to interrogatories addressed to the State of Utah by the California defendants. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Clyde, George D, Callister, E. R, McCarthy, Dennis, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T19:24:50.577Z
158 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for production of document by the State of Arizona. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T16:18:56.574Z
159 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master request of the California defendants for admissions. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T15:02:31.045Z
160 Recommendations of the California defendants regarding the proposed pre-trial order : IIB. maps : Arizona v. California. 1956 Arizona, complainant, California, defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T17:03:44.874Z
161 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master amended answers of the State of Arizona to interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants, sets no. 1 and no. 2 and answers to set no. 3. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Moeur, John H, Frank, John P, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, Akin, Wayne M, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court, Arizona Interstate Stream Commission 2017-05-19T15:57:18.574Z
162 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master brief of the California defendants in support of their recommendations as to the order of proof to be observed at the trial. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T18:07:59.458Z
163 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for production of documents by the United States of America. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T18:15:27.525Z
164 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master brief of the California defendants in response to objections by the United States to interrogatories : sets numbers 1 and 2 : and motion to require further answers. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California(Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T19:44:30.593Z
165 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for an order relating to rights of the parties to interview government officials and employees. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T15:52:25.343Z
166 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State of New Mexico, party answer of California defendants to complaint and answer in intervention by the State of Utah, and : interrogatories addressed to the State of Utah by the California defendants. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T17:11:54.236Z
167 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants to require further answers of the State of New Mexico to interrogatories, and brief of the California defendants in support thereof. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T18:08:24.294Z
168 Transcripts of Special Proceedings: Before the Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master 1. Oral Argument: Joinder Motion: Dec. 8, 1955; 2. Minutes, New York Meeting: Jan. 30, 1956; 3. Discussion of Pre-trial Order: April 21, 1956 1956 Rifkind, Simon H., State of Arizona, Plaintiff, State of California, Defendant 2022-01-12T20:08:55.255Z
169 In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master memorandum re rule 43(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "Record of Excluded Evidence" : submitted by the California defendants. 1956 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-22T19:12:57.279Z
170 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, June 14, 1956, Friday, June 15, 1956, Tuesday, June 19, 1956 (v. 1 [v. 1 – 2 – 3], pp. 1-532), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, 1955 Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:22:20.997Z
171 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, June 20, 1956, Thursday, June 21, 1956, Friday, June 22, 1956 (v. 2 [v. 4 – 5 – 6], pp. 533-1048-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:29:34.979Z
172 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, June 25, 1956, Tuesday, June 26, 1956, Wednesday, June 27, 1956 (v. 3 [v. 7 – 8 – 9], pp. 1049-1550-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:34:15.016Z
173 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, June 28, 1956, Friday, June 29, 1956, Monday, July 2, 1956 (v. 4 [v. 10 – 11 – 12], pp. 1551-2062), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:37:03.661Z
174 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 21, 1956, Wednesday, August 22, 1956, Thursday, August 23, 1956, Friday, August 24, 1956, Monday, August 27, 1956 (v. 12 [v. 35–36–37- 38 - 39], pp. 5676-6303), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:52:44.872Z
175 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, July 3, 1956, Thursday, July 5, 1956, Friday, July 6, 1956 (v. 5 [v. 13 – 14 – 15], pp. 2063-2637), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:38:51.128Z
176 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, July 31, 1956, Wednesday, August 1, 1956, Thursday, August 2, 1956 (v. 9 [v. 25 – 26 – 27], pp. 4172-4706), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:46:34.35Z
177 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, July 23, 1956, Tuesday, July 24, 1956, Wednesday, July 25, 1956 (v. 7 [v. 19 – 20 – 21], pp. 3136-3653-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:42:17.551Z
178 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 26, 1956, Friday, July 27, 1956, Monday, July 30, 1956 (v. 8 [v. 22 – 23 – 24], pp. 3654-4171), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:44:17.861Z
179 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, July 18, 1956, Thursday, July 19, 1956, Friday, July 20, 1956 (v. 6 [v. 16 – 17 – 18], pp. 2638-3135-A), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:40:40.197Z
180 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 16, 1956, Friday, August 17, 1956, Monday, August 20, 1956 (v. 11 [v. 32 – 33 – 34], pp. 5156-5675-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:50:43.623Z
181 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 3, 1956, Monday, August 13, 1956, Tuesday, August 14, 1956, Wednesday, August 15, 1956 (v. 10 [v. 28 – 29 – 30 - 31], pp. 4707-5155-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:48:28.631Z
182 Reporters’ Transcript : Pre Trial Conference : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, April 10 - Friday, April 13, 1956, Arizona v. California, No. 10. Pre Trial Conference 1956 State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master 2022-05-19T15:06:42.436Z
183 Oral Arguments on Defendants’ Motion to Join, as Parties, the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, Before George I. Haight, Special Master, Stenographic Transcript, Vol. 1 1955-07-18 Haight, George I., California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener 2021-11-30T20:23:36.115Z
184 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded, before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master tentative outline of witnesses for Arizona. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Moeur, John H, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T14:09:57.366Z
185 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : states of New Mexico and Utah, impleaded response of State of Arizona to appearance and statement of New Mexico. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Moeur, John H, John P. (John Paul), 1917-2002, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T19:18:00.864Z
186 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener special master's report on the motion of the California defendants to join as parties the states of New Mexico, Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming. 1955 Arizona 2017-05-18T20:40:52.671Z
187 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener memorandum of the California defendants in reply to motion of the United States for determination of questions of law presented by the pleadings in this cause and the report of the special master. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Brody, George, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Higgins, Shelley J, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T13:54:36.935Z
188 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener petition for rehearing of decision denying motion to join the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Higgins, Shelley J, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T14:17:33.981Z
189 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.] defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener appearance and statement in behalf of New Mexico of its claim of interest in and to Lower Basin waters. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Robinson, Richard H, Wilson, Fred E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T20:12:12.831Z
190 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener exceptions of the California defendants to the report and recommendations of the special master with respect to their motion to join the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, and brief in support of exceptions. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Brody, George, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Higgins, Shelley J, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T21:05:34.356Z
191 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener brief of the State of Nevada, intervener, in re motion of California to join as parties the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Dickerson, Harvey, Edwards, H. W, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Kane, William J, Dunseath, William N, Barrett, John W, Goldwater, David, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T18:18:26.624Z
192 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded: before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master opening statement of Mr. John H. Moeur, chief counsel, Arizona Interstate Stream Commission. 1955 Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Moeur, John H, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, Arizona Interstate Stream Commission, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T20:57:23.503Z
193 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener reply of California defendants to Arizona's memorandum filed November 1, 1955, directed to the report of the special master. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Brody, George, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Higgins, Shelley J, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T14:05:55.016Z
194 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : states of New Mexico and Utah, impleaded statement of position of Arizona. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Moeur, John H, John P. (John Paul), 1917-2002, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T20:52:33.005Z
195 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener response of the States of Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico to motion of the United States of America for determination of questions of law prior to determination of joinder motion. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Callister, E. R, McCarthy, Dennis, Robinson, Richard, Wilson, Fred E, Dunbar, Duke W, Chilson, Hatfield, Guy, George F, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-19T14:28:34.486Z
196 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master answers to interrogatories propounded to the State of Nevada by the California defendants. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Kane, William J, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T18:42:47.755Z
197 State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener exceptions of intervening State of Nevada to the report and recommendations of the special master concerning California's motion to join Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Kane, William J, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T20:09:08.341Z
198 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener reply brief of the California defendants in support of their motion to join, as parties, the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Wheatley, Charles F, Norris, William Albert, 1927-, Friedman, Howard I, Jenney, Francis E, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Higgins, Shelley J, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T21:29:13.805Z
199 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener memorandum of Arizona (a) in reply to motion of the United States for preliminary determination of questions of law : and (b) in reply to California's and Nevada's exceptions to the Master's report on the question of joinder of four states. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Moeur, John H, Frank, John P. (John Paul), 1917-2002, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T19:14:05.677Z
200 State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : states of New Mexico and Utah, impleaded response of State of Arizona to complaint and answer by the State of Utah. 1955 Arizona, complainant, Moeur, John H, John P. (John Paul), 1917-2002, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court 2017-05-18T19:24:56.671Z

Pages