Arizona v. California
Sort By:
(1 - 200 of 233)
Pages
| # | Title | Title cont'd | Year | Authors | fgs_createdDate_dt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Transcripts of Special Proceedings : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : 1. Oral Argument : Joinder Motion : Dec. 8, 1955 -- 2. Minutes, New York Meeting : Jan. 30, 1956 -- 3. Discussion of Pre-trial Order : April 21, 1956, Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, 1955 Term | Part B. Recommended Decree Conferences | 1960-08-19 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Southern District Court Reporters, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:37.51Z |
| 2 | Transcripts of Special Proceedings : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : 1. Oral Argument : Joinder Motion : Dec. 8, 1955 -- 2. Minutes, New York Meeting : Jan. 30, 1956 -- 3. Discussion of Pre-trial Order : April 21, 1956, Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, 1955 Term. | Part A. Offer of Proof and Argument | 1960-08-17 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Southern District Court Reporters, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:36.169Z |
| 3 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, August 27, 1958, Thursday, August 28, 1958 (v. 43 [v. 130 – 131], pp. 22,114-22,593), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:34.303Z | |
| 4 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 22, 1958, Tuesday, August 26, 1958 (v. 42 [v. 128 – 129], pp. 21,713-22,113), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:32.793Z | |
| 5 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 19, 1958, Wednesday, August 20, 1958, Thursday, August 21, 1958 (v. 41 [v. 125 – 126 – 127], pp. 21,107-21,712), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:30.889Z | |
| 6 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 14, 1958, Friday, August 15, 1958, Monday, August 18, 1958 (v. 40 [v. 122 – 123 – 124], pp. 20,514-21,106), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:28.925Z | |
| 7 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Saturday, July 12, 1958, Monday, July 14, 1958, Tuesday, July 15, 1958 (v. 38 [v. 116 – 117 – 118], pp. 19,428-19,986), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:27.159Z | |
| 8 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, July 9, 1958, Thursday, July 10, 1958, Friday, July 11, 1958 (v. 37 [v. 113 – 114 – 115], pp. 18,908-19,427), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:24.601Z | |
| 9 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 3, 1958, Monday, July 7, 1958, Tuesday, July 8, 1958 (v. 36 [v. 110 – 111 – 112], pp. 18,345-18,907), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:22.606Z | |
| 10 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, May 19, 1958, Tuesday, July 1, 1958, Wednesday, July 2, 1958 (v. 35 [v. 107 – 108 – 109], pp. 17,781-18,344), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:20.437Z | |
| 11 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, May 14, 1958, Thursday, May 15, 1958, Friday, May 16, 1958 (v. 34 [v. 104 – 105 – 106], pp. 17,248-17,780), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:18.799Z | |
| 12 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, May 9, 1958, Monday, May 12, 1958, Tuesday, May 13, 1958 (v. 33 [v. 101 – 102 – 103], pp. 16,689-17,247), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:17.119Z | |
| 13 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, May 6, 1958, Wednesday, May 7, 1958, Thursday, May 8, 1958 (v. 32 [v. 98 – 99 – 100], pp. 16,168-16,688), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:15.959Z | |
| 14 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, May 2, 1958, Saturday, May 3, 1958, Monday, May 5, 1958 (v. 31 [v. 95 – 96 – 97], pp. 15,639-16,167), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:13.242Z | |
| 15 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, January 15, 1958, Thursday, January 16, 1958, Friday, January 17, 1958 (v. 30 [v. 92 – 93 – 94], pp. 15,178-15,638), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:11.828Z | |
| 16 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, January 10, 1958, Monday, January 13, 1958, Tuesday, January 14, 1958 (v. 29 [v. 89 – 90 – 91], pp. 14,662-15,177), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:10.04Z | |
| 17 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, January 7, 1958, Wednesday, January 8, 1958, Thursday, January 9, 1958 (v. 28 [v. 86 – 87 – 88], pp. 14,126-14,661), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:06.522Z | |
| 18 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 22, 1957, Friday, August 23, 1957, Monday, January 6, 1958 (v. 27 [v. 83 – 84 – 85], pp. 13,611-14,125), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1957 & 1958 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:35:02.397Z | |
| 19 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, August 19, 1957, Tuesday, August 20, 1957, Wednesday, August 21, 1957 (v. 26 [v. 80 – 81 – 82], pp. 13,145-13,610; Includes Conference of Tuesday, August 20, 1957), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:59.613Z | |
| 20 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, August 14, 1957, Thursday, August 15, 1957, Friday, August 16, 1957 (v. 25 [v. 77 – 78 – 79], pp. 12,604-13,144), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:57.257Z | |
| 21 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 9, 1957, Monday, August 12, 1957, Tuesday, August 13, 1957 (v. 24 [v. 74 – 75 – 76], pp. 12,072-12,603), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:54.402Z | |
| 22 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 6, 1957, Wednesday, August 7, 1957, Thursday, August 8, 1957 (v. 23 [v. 71 – 72 – 73], pp. 11,510-12,071), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:53.244Z | |
| 23 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 18, 1957, Friday, July 19, 1957, Monday, August 5, 1957 (v. 22 [v. 68 – 69 – 70], pp. 11,015-11,509), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:51.176Z | |
| 24 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, July 15, 1957, Tuesday, July 16, 1957, Wednesday, July 17, 1957 (v. 21 [v. 65 – 66 – 67], pp. 10,500-11,014A), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:47.781Z | |
| 25 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, July 10, 1957, Thursday, July 11, 1957, Friday, July 12, 1957 (v. 20 [v. 62 – 63 – 64], pp. 9930-10,499), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:45.907Z | |
| 26 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Saturday, July 6, 1957, Monday, July 8, 1957, Tuesday, July 9, 1957 (v. 19 [v. 59 – 60 – 61], pp. 9449-9929), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:44.223Z | |
| 27 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, July 2, 1957, Wednesday, July 3, 1957, Friday, July 5, 1957 (v. 18 [v. 56 – 57 – 58], pp. 8895-9448), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:42.471Z | |
| 28 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, May 16, 1957, Friday, May 17, 1957, Monday, July 1, 1957 (v. 17 [v. 53 – 54 – 55], pp. 8406-8894), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:41.087Z | |
| 29 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, May 13, 1957, Tuesday, May 14, 1957, Wednesday, May 15, 1957 (v. 16 [v. 50 – 51 – 52], pp. 7919-8405), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:39.687Z | |
| 30 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, May 8, 1957, Thursday, May 9, 1957, Friday, May 10, 1957 (v. 15 [v. 47 – 48 – 49], pp. 7426-7918), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:38.005Z | |
| 31 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, February 15, 1957, Monday, May 6, 1957, Tuesday, May 7, 1957 (v. 14 [v. 44 – 45 – 46], pp. 6934-7425), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:35.397Z | |
| 32 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, February 11, 1957, Tuesday, February 12, 1957, Wednesday, February 13, 1957, Thursday, February 14, 1957 (v. 13 [v. 40 – 41 – 42 - 43], pp. 6304-6933), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1957 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T17:34:33.17Z | |
| 33 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 21, 1956, Wednesday, August 22, 1956, Thursday, August 23, 1956, Friday, August 24, 1956, Monday, August 27, 1956 (v. 12 [v. 35–36–37- 38 - 39], pp. 5676-6303), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:52:44.872Z | |
| 34 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 16, 1956, Friday, August 17, 1956, Monday, August 20, 1956 (v. 11 [v. 32 – 33 – 34], pp. 5156-5675-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:50:43.623Z | |
| 35 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 3, 1956, Monday, August 13, 1956, Tuesday, August 14, 1956, Wednesday, August 15, 1956 (v. 10 [v. 28 – 29 – 30 - 31], pp. 4707-5155-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:48:28.631Z | |
| 36 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, July 31, 1956, Wednesday, August 1, 1956, Thursday, August 2, 1956 (v. 9 [v. 25 – 26 – 27], pp. 4172-4706), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:46:34.35Z | |
| 37 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 26, 1956, Friday, July 27, 1956, Monday, July 30, 1956 (v. 8 [v. 22 – 23 – 24], pp. 3654-4171), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:44:17.861Z | |
| 38 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, July 23, 1956, Tuesday, July 24, 1956, Wednesday, July 25, 1956 (v. 7 [v. 19 – 20 – 21], pp. 3136-3653-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:42:17.551Z | |
| 39 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, July 18, 1956, Thursday, July 19, 1956, Friday, July 20, 1956 (v. 6 [v. 16 – 17 – 18], pp. 2638-3135-A), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:40:40.197Z | |
| 40 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, July 3, 1956, Thursday, July 5, 1956, Friday, July 6, 1956 (v. 5 [v. 13 – 14 – 15], pp. 2063-2637), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:38:51.128Z | |
| 41 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, June 28, 1956, Friday, June 29, 1956, Monday, July 2, 1956 (v. 4 [v. 10 – 11 – 12], pp. 1551-2062), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:37:03.661Z | |
| 42 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, June 25, 1956, Tuesday, June 26, 1956, Wednesday, June 27, 1956 (v. 3 [v. 7 – 8 – 9], pp. 1049-1550-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:34:15.016Z | |
| 43 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, June 20, 1956, Thursday, June 21, 1956, Friday, June 22, 1956 (v. 2 [v. 4 – 5 – 6], pp. 533-1048-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:29:34.979Z | |
| 44 | Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, June 14, 1956, Friday, June 15, 1956, Tuesday, June 19, 1956 (v. 1 [v. 1 – 2 – 3], pp. 1-532), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, 1955 Term. | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:22:20.997Z | |
| 45 | Reporters’ Transcript : Pre Trial Conference : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, April 10 - Friday, April 13, 1956, Arizona v. California, No. 10. | Pre Trial Conference | 1956 | State of Arizona, complainant, State of California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, defendant, City of Los Angeles, California, defendant, City of San Diego, California, defendant, County of San Diego, California, defendant, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party, Gagan & McDaniels, reporters, Rifkind, Simon H., special master | 2022-05-19T15:06:42.436Z |
| 46 | Transcripts of Special Proceedings: Before the Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master | 1. Oral Argument: Joinder Motion: Dec. 8, 1955; 2. Minutes, New York Meeting: Jan. 30, 1956; 3. Discussion of Pre-trial Order: April 21, 1956 | 1956 | Rifkind, Simon H., State of Arizona, Plaintiff, State of California, Defendant | 2022-01-12T20:08:55.255Z |
| 47 | Transcript of New York Hearings, New York, NY, August 17, 1960 (Southern District Court Reporters), Before Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: Stenographer’s Minutes | Parts A. Offer of proof and argument; and B. Recommended decree conferences | 1960-08-17 | State of California, Defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Defendant, Imperial Irrigation District, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, State of Nevada, Intervener, State of New Mexico, Party, State of Utah, Party | 2021-12-06T16:36:03.298Z |
| 48 | Oral Arguments on Defendants’ Motion to Join, as Parties, the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, Before George I. Haight, Special Master, Stenographic Transcript, Vol. 1 | 1955-07-18 | Haight, George I., California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener | 2021-11-30T20:23:36.115Z | |
| 49 | Motion on Behalf of Navajo Tribe of Indians of the Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, for Leave to Intervene, Brief in Support Thereof, and Petition of Intervention | 1961-09-25 | Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, Nevada, Intervener, Utah, Impleaded Defendant, New Mexico, Impleaded Defendant, Kirgis, Frederic L., Littell, Norman M., McPherson, Joseph F. | 2021-11-03T20:56:28.708Z | |
| 50 | Affadavit of Services | 1962-06-15 | Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, Nevada, Intervener, Utah, Impleaded Defendant, New Mexico, Impleaded Defendant, Rifkind, Simon H. | 2021-11-03T20:51:18.218Z | |
| 51 | New Mexico's Exceptions to the Report and Recommended Decree of the Special Master | 1960-12-05 | Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, Nevada, Intervener, Utah, Impleaded Defendant, New Mexico, Impleaded Defendant | 2021-11-03T20:48:27.821Z | |
| 52 | Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Recommended Decree on File Herein, Dated December 5, 1960, Filed by Defendant, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, on Its Behalf and on Behalf of Its Co-Defendants, The City of Los Angeles, and Its Department of Water and Power, The City of San Diego, and The County of San Diego | 1961-02-27 | Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, Nevada, Intervener, New Mexico, Party, Utah, Party, Howard, James H., Special Counsel, Cooper, Charles C. Jr., Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P. | 2021-11-03T20:45:13.497Z | |
| 53 | Memorandum of the California Defendants in Reply to Memorandum of the United States Requesting a Pre-Trial Conference | 1954-05-28 | Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, United States of America, Intervener, Brown, Edmund G., Ely, Northcutt, McCarthy, Robert L., Nelson, Gilbert F., Jaffe, Irving, Wolf, Robert Sterling, Jenney, Francis E., Horton, Harry W., Knox, R.L., Jr., Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H., Cooper, Charles C. Jr., Keith, Donald M., Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P., Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H., Du Paul, J.F., Higgins, Shelley J., Cosgrove, T.B., Keller, James Don | 2021-11-03T20:40:15.207Z | |
| 54 | Answer of Complainant of Arizona to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the State of Nevada | 1953-07-14 | Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, Nevada, Intervener, Moeur, John H., Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M., Jones, Ross F., Thompson, Howard F. | 2021-11-03T20:33:18.561Z | |
| 55 | Answer of California Defendants to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the United States of America and Summary of the Controversy (Exhibit A) | 1954-04-05 | Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, Brown, Edmund G., Ely, Northcutt, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F., Jaffe, Irving, Wolf, Robert Sterling, Jenney, Francis E., Horton, Harry W., Knox, R.L., Jr., Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H., Cooper, Charles C., Jr., Keith, Donald M., Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P., Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H., Du Paul, J.F., Higgins, Shelley J., Cosgrove, T.B., Keller, James Don | 2021-11-03T20:30:21.863Z | |
| 56 | Complainant's Objections to Motion on Behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for Leave to File Petition to Intervene | 1953-03-04 | Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, Moeur, John H., Chief Counsel Arizona Interstate Stream Commission, Sutter, Burr, Assistant Counsel Arizona Interstate Stream Commission, Jones, Ross F., Attourney General of Arizona, Eversole, John Hanley, Chief Assistant Attorney General of Arizona | 2021-11-03T19:27:13.6Z | |
| 57 | Motion of Colter Water Project Ass'n, Inc. for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curaie | 1953-05-20 | Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, Croaff, Thomas J., Jr., Attorney for Movant, Croaff, Vernon B., Attorney for Movant, Chester, William H., Attorney for Movant, Levitin, Sam S., Attorney for Movant, Watson, Herbert, Attorney for Movant | 2021-11-03T19:23:39.384Z | |
| 58 | Motion on Behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for Leave to File Petition to Intervene | 1953-02-10 | Arizona, Complainant, California, Defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Defendant, Imperial Irrication District, Defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District, Defendant, Meropolitan Water District of Southern California, Defendant, City of Los Angeles, Defendant, City of San Diego, Defendant, County of San Diego, Defendant, Samuel Langerman, Attorney for Petitioners | 2021-11-03T19:18:52.746Z | |
| 59 | Letter from Archibald Cox, Solicitor General, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, D.C. to Honorable John F. Davis, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. | 1962-01-29 | Cox, Archibald, Davis, John F. | 2021-11-03T19:12:52.393Z | |
| 60 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants to strike certain exhibits introduced by the complainant, State of Arizona. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, 1901-1995; Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-10-30T16:57:28.799Z |
| 61 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | interrogatories addressed to complainant, State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 1. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-10-30T16:43:31.764Z |
| 62 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded | [transcript of arguments] | 1962 | Arizona, Complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Wilmer, Mark, Reed, Charles H, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Parry, R. P., McCarthy, Dennis, Hartley, Earl, Mann, Claud S, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T16:07:44.139Z |
| 63 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : Colorado River Indian Tribes ... [et al.], recommended interveners | Elbert P. Tuttle, special master : report. | 1982 | Arizona, complainant, Tuttle, Elbert P. (Elbert Parr), 1897-1996, special master, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and California, recommended intervenver, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T14:10:57.798Z |
| 64 | Arizona v. California et al. : no. 8, original : Decree carrying into effect this Court’s opinion of June 3, 1963, 373 U.S. 546. | 1964 | United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T14:07:19.371Z | |
| 65 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1963, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties | decree of court : as submitted by Imperial Irrigation District. | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Carter, James, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T14:05:09.961Z |
| 66 | [State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : States of Utah and New Mexico, impleaded defendants | Order denying petitions for rehearing] | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T14:01:53.054Z |
| 67 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al. | memorandum of the United States respecting certain proposals for inclusion in decree. | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T13:57:43.198Z |
| 68 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, no. 8 original, October term 1963 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : States of Utah and New Mexico, impleaded defendants | petition of Imperial Irrigation District for rehearing : with supporting material. | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Carter, James, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T13:54:28.194Z |
| 69 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al. | agreed provisions for proposed final decree. | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T13:50:41.966Z |
| 70 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1963, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants | petition of defendant the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for rehearing and argument in support of petition. | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Lauten, John H, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Howard, James H, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T13:48:02.318Z |
| 71 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants | proposals for articles I(G), (H), II(B)(2), II(B)(4), II(B)(7) of decree : submitted by State of California : in which join the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Coachella Valley County Water District, and Palo Verde Irrigation District : December 18, 1963. | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Muys, Jerome C, Mann, Roy H, Redwine, Earl, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Lauten, John H, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Howard, James H, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Firestone, Alan M, McLees, Bertram, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T13:44:03.147Z |
| 72 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded | intervener State of Nevada's comments on proposed decree. | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T13:39:00.934Z |
| 73 | Arizona v. California et al. : on exceptions to special master's report and recommended decree : no. 8, original. | 1963 | United States. Supreme Court, Arizona, complainant, California, defendant | 2017-05-25T13:35:06.3Z | |
| 74 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties | supplement and amendment to Imperial Irrigation District's form of "decree of court" as heretofore and herewith submitted. | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Carter, James H, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T13:32:17.709Z |
| 75 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants | petition for rehearing : submitted by State of California : in which join the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Coachella Valley County Water District, and Palo Verde Irrigation District : September 16, 1963. | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Muys, Jerome C, Mann, Roy H, Redwine, Earl, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Lauten, John H, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Howard, James H, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Firestone, Alan M, McLees, Bertram, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T13:28:11.511Z |
| 76 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1963 : no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant, State of Utah, impleaded defendant | statement by Arizona on decree proposed by the United States. | 1963 | Arizona, complainant, Salmon, Riney B, Wilmer, Mark, Sutter, Burr, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-25T13:21:04.321Z |
| 77 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded | Arizona's motion for adoption, with exceptions, of the special master's report and recommended decree. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Udall, Calvin H, Will, John Geoffrey, Roberts, W. H, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T20:18:40.449Z |
| 78 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded | reply brief for the State of Nevada, intervener. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T20:03:47.522Z |
| 79 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded | answering brief for the State of Nevada, intervener. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:59:42.128Z |
| 80 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded | opening brief for the state of Nevada, intervener | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:45:51.16Z |
| 81 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants | legislative history appendixes accompanying the reply brief of the California defendants to the answering briefs of the United States, Arizona, and Nevada. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:42:08.875Z |
| 82 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded | the State of Nevada's exceptions to the report of Special Master, Simon H. Rifkind, dated December 5, 1960; and the recommended decree included therein. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:38:47.834Z |
| 83 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants | reply brief of the California defendants to the answering briefs of the United States, Arizona, and Nevada. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Nelson, Gilbert F, Alexander, John R, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Firestone, Alan M, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:34:52.953Z |
| 84 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants | answering brief of the California defendants to the exceptions and opening briefs of the United States, Arizona, and Nevada. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Nelson, Gilbert F, Alexander, John R, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Firestone, Alan M, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:28:25.474Z |
| 85 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants | opening brief of the California defendants in support of their exceptions to the report of the special master. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Nelson, Gilbert F, Alexander, John R, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:21:29.206Z |
| 86 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant | reply brief for Arizona. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Udall, Calvin H, Will, John Geoffrey, Roberts, W. H, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:14:50.175Z |
| 87 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants | closing brief of Imperial Irrigation District. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Knox, R. L, Horton, Harry W, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:10:09.946Z |
| 88 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener: State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant | answering brief for Arizona. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Udall, Calvin H, Will, John Geoffrey, Roberts, W. H, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:05:55.785Z |
| 89 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al. | response of the United States to the motion on behalf of the Navajo tribe of Indians for leave to intervene. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T19:00:30.587Z |
| 90 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al. | reply brief for the United States. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Davis, John F, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T18:57:04.398Z |
| 91 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. state of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant | Arizona's legislative history of sections 4(a), 5 (1st paragraph), and 8 of the Boulder Canyon Project Act. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Reed, Charles H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Udall, Calvin H, Will, John Geoffrey, Roberts, W. H, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court, Arizona. Legislature | 2017-05-24T18:53:41.618Z |
| 92 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al. | answering brief of the United States. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Davis, John F, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T18:48:26.597Z |
| 93 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant | opening brief for Arizona / Chas. H. Reed, chief counsel ... [et al.] | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Reed, Charles H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Udall, Calvin H, Will, John Geoffrey, Roberts, W. H, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T18:45:00.052Z |
| 94 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al. | exceptions of the United States, intervener, to the special master's report and recommended decree. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant;, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T18:40:21.666Z |
| 95 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al. | brief in support of exceptions of the United States, intervener, to the special master's report and recommended decree. | 1961 | Arizona, complainant, Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Davis, John F, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T18:37:40.41Z |
| 96 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master | New Mexico's comments on the special master's report, May 5, 1960. | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Dickson, Hilton A., Jr, Olson, Thomas O, Mann, Claud S, Cornell, Dudley, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T18:32:42.899Z |
| 97 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | offer of proof and brief in support of offer : submitted by the California defendants, August 17, 1960, New York City, New York. | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T18:28:41.86Z |
| 98 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | comments of the State of Nevada on draft report of special master, dated May 5, 1960. | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T18:09:33.833Z |
| 99 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants | exceptions of the California defendants to the report of the special master. | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Malkan, Gerald, Duncan, C. Emerson, II, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T18:06:14.776Z |
| 100 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants | Simon H. Rifkind, special master : report. | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico,impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T18:00:24.926Z |
| 101 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | motion to reopen the trial for the taking of evidence re depletion of the Colorado River at Lee Ferry by the Upper Basin, and statement in support of motion | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T17:55:48.889Z |
| 102 | Upper Colorado River Commission summary : no. 9 original, in the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1959 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and the State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants | Simon H. Rifkind, special master : draft report [summary] | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Upper Colorado River Commission, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T17:13:57.514Z |
| 103 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | comments, suggestions, and motions of the California defendants re the Special Master's Draft report, dated May 5, 1960. | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Alexander, John R, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Friedman, Howard I, Jenney, Francis, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T17:09:28.397Z |
| 104 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants | Simon H. Rifkind, special master : draft report | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T17:02:16.739Z |
| 105 | Water supply of the Lower Colorado River Basin : extracts from brief and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, submitted April 1, 1959, to Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master, by the California defendants and excerpts from the evidence, Arizona v. California, no. 9 original October 1959 term. | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T16:59:01.456Z | |
| 106 | Arizona v. California : no. 9 original, October 1959 term | offer of proof : table of contents, text of documents submitted by California defendants. | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, California, defendant | 2017-05-24T16:50:26.586Z |
| 107 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | Arizona's comments on the draft report and recommended decree. | 1960 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T16:42:03.809Z |
| 108 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master | rebuttal brief of the United States of America. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Rankin, J. Lee, Morton, Perry W, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, Wise, Warren R, Luellman, Charles G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T16:37:31.203Z |
| 109 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master | findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the California defendants : in three volumes : volume I. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant;, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T16:33:49.291Z |
| 110 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | supplementary brief submitted on behalf of defendant the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Du Paul, J. F, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T16:19:35.98Z |
| 111 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | Arizona's answering brief. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant;, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T16:14:41.809Z |
| 112 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master | reply brief of the United States of America. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Rankin, J. Lee, Morton, Perry W, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T16:10:36.229Z |
| 113 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master | findings of fact and conclusions of law : in three volumes : volume III : findings and conclusions relating to specific projects, proposed severally by : A. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, for itself and the City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego; B. Palo Verde Irrigation District; C. Coachella Valley County Water District; D. Imperial Irrigation District, accompanied by a brief on behalf of that district. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T16:06:39.035Z |
| 114 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | supplemental and alternative findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the California defendants : proposed jointly by the State of California and other California defendants. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T15:58:30.933Z |
| 115 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | Arizona's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T15:51:38.219Z |
| 116 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master | findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the United States of America. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Rankin, J. Lee, Morton, Perry W, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T15:39:50.612Z |
| 117 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the State of Utah. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T15:36:18.585Z |
| 118 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master | New Mexico's requested findings of facts and conclusions of law. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Zinn, Frank B, Billhymer, Paul L, Moise, Irwin S, Mann, Claud S, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T15:26:18.652Z |
| 119 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | opening brief for Arizona. | 1958 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T15:20:44.307Z |
| 120 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master | brief in support of findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the United States of America. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Rankin, J. Lee, Morton, Perry W, Warner, David R, Kiechel, Walter, Jr, Wise, Warren R, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, impleaded defendant, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T14:51:18.357Z |
| 121 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | response of the California defendants to requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, and brief in support thereof of the State of New Mexico. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T14:47:27.919Z |
| 122 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master | New Mexico's brief in support of its requested findings of fact and conclusions of law. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Zinn, Frank B, Billhymer, Paul L, Moise, Irwin S, Mann, Claud S, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T14:41:13.021Z |
| 123 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | Arizona's objections to findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by other parties. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T14:37:38.79Z |
| 124 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | response of the California defendants to brief in support of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States of America. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T14:28:33.264Z |
| 125 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and brief relating thereto of the State of Nevada. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-24T14:21:09.439Z |
| 126 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States of America. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-23T16:32:49.674Z |
| 127 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and opening brief of the State of Arizona. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-23T16:16:45.902Z |
| 128 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties: before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | supplemental rebuttal brief of defendant Imperial Irrigation District. | 1959 | Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Horton, Harry W, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party | 2017-05-23T16:00:58.57Z |
| 129 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master | New Mexico's rebuttal brief. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Zinn, Frank B, Olson, Thomas O, Mann, Claud S, Billhymer, Paul L, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-23T15:58:01.216Z |
| 130 | State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master | New Mexico's objections to certain requested findings of fact and conclusions of law of Arizona, California, Nevada and the United States. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Zinn, Frank B, Olson, Thomas O, Mann, Claud S, Billhymer, Paul L, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-23T15:54:40.066Z |
| 131 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | reply brief of the State of Nevada. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Dunseath, William N, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-23T15:51:08.189Z |
| 132 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | rebuttal brief of the California defendants. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Dietz, Henry, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-23T15:35:16.14Z |
| 133 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | answering brief of the State of Nevada. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Dunseath, William N, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-23T15:27:38.676Z |
| 134 | United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | Arizona special appendix : the detailed bases for Arizona's objections to New Mexico's proposed findings and conclusions relating to "present uses" and "future uses" in New Mexico : to accompany Arizona's answering brief. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Meagher, William R, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Will, John Geoffrey, Udall, Calvin H, Begam, Robert G, Kiendl, Theodore, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant | 2017-05-23T15:17:33.41Z |
| 135 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master | findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the California defendants : in three volumes : volume II. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-23T14:49:59.027Z |
| 136 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master | brief of the California defendants to accompany their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law : in two volumes : volume two : appendices. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-23T14:41:35.401Z |
| 137 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master | brief of the California defendants to accompany their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law : in two volumes : volume one. | 1959 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E, Nelson, Gilbert F, Gindler, Burton J, Alexander, John R, Sondheim, Harry B, Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L, Wheatley, Charles F, Muys, Jerome C, Hufstedler, Shirley M, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-23T14:33:00.019Z |
| 138 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master | brief relating to findings of fact and conclusions of law, Nevada : volume II. | 1958 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Dunseath, W. N, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T21:38:53.014Z |
| 139 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master | proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, Nevada : volume I. | 1958 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Foley, Roger D, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Dunseath, W. N, Parry, R. P, Fix, Clifford E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T21:20:45.792Z |
| 140 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master | opening statement on behalf of the intervening State of Nevada. | 1958 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T20:13:28.659Z |
| 141 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | rebuttal brief of the State of Utah. | 1957 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court, Budge, Walter L, McCarthy, Dennis | 2017-05-22T20:09:33.29Z |
| 142 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, intervenors : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | reply brief of the State of Utah to findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and the United States. | 1957 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Callister, E. R, McCarthy, Dennis, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T20:05:08.165Z |
| 143 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded | complainant's amended reply to California defendants' answer. | 1957 | Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T19:52:07.071Z |
| 144 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded | complainant's amended response to appearance and statement of New Mexico. | 1957 | Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T19:47:26.704Z |
| 145 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | amended and supplemental statement of position by complainant, State of Arizona. | 1957 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Reed, Charles H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T19:42:48.766Z |
| 146 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded | amended answer to petition of intervention on behalf of the State of Nevada. | 1957 | Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T19:33:53.974Z |
| 147 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded | amended bill of complaint. | 1957 | Arizona, complainant, Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T19:28:50.259Z |
| 148 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded | complainant's amended response to complaint and answer in intervention by the State of Utah. | 1957 | Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T19:24:30.57Z |
| 149 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded | complainant's motion for leave to file amended pleadings. | 1957 | Reed, Chas. H, Wilmer, Mark, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Madden, John E, Begam, Robert G, Udall, Calvin H, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T19:20:25.565Z |
| 150 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the State of Utah. | 1957 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Callister, E. R, McCarthy, Dennis, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T19:16:55.878Z |
| 151 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | memorandum re rule 43(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "Record of Excluded Evidence" : submitted by the California defendants. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T19:12:57.279Z |
| 152 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | interrogatories addressed to complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 1. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T18:15:06.277Z |
| 153 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | brief of the California defendants in support of their recommendations as to the order of proof to be observed at the trial. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T18:07:59.458Z |
| 154 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State of New Mexico, party | answer of California defendants to complaint and answer in intervention by the State of Utah, and : interrogatories addressed to the State of Utah by the California defendants. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T17:11:54.236Z |
| 155 | Recommendations of the California defendants regarding the proposed pre-trial order : IIB. maps : Arizona v. California. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, California, defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T17:03:44.874Z | |
| 156 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | comments on Arizona's proposed specification of issues : submitted by the California defendants. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T16:58:57.612Z |
| 157 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | memorandum of the California defendants in clarification of interrogatories to the United States : and resubmitted interrogatories. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T16:56:00.658Z |
| 158 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | opening statement on behalf of the State of Utah. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-22T16:49:48.402Z |
| 159 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | answers of the State of New Mexico to interrogatories addressed to the State of New Mexico by the California defendants. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Robinson, Richard H, Wilson, Fred E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T20:45:50.149Z |
| 160 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | brief of the California defendants in response to objections by the United States to interrogatories : sets numbers 1 and 2 : and motion to require further answers. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California(Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T19:44:30.593Z |
| 161 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [el al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State of New Mexico, party | answers of the State of Utah to interrogatories addressed to the State of Utah by the California defendants. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Clyde, George D, Callister, E. R, McCarthy, Dennis, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T19:24:50.577Z |
| 162 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | response of the state of New Mexico to the motion of the California defendants to require further answers of the state of New Mexico to interrogatories and answer to brief of California defendants in support thereof. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Wilson, Fred E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T19:21:07.838Z |
| 163 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties: before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | availability of Article III(b) waters for use in California: legislative history of section 4(a) of Boulder Canyon Project Act (limitation provision): bills, amendments, and debates in chronological order: 70th Cong., 1st & 2d Sess. (1927-1928): submitted by the California defendants. | 1956 | Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court, New Mexico, party, Utah, party | 2017-05-19T19:17:22.643Z |
| 164 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the Sate of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 4. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T19:11:06.485Z |
| 165 | State of Arizona, plaintiff, vs. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener | complaint and answer in intervention by the State of Utah. | 1956 | Arizona, plaintiff, Callister, E. R, McCarthy, Dennis, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T19:01:54.681Z |
| 166 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : States of New Mexico and Utah, impleaded | statement of position of New Mexico. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Robinson, Richard H, Wilson, Fred E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T18:58:45.162Z |
| 167 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | memorandum of the California defendants in support of their motion of April 11, 1956, to require further answers of complainant, State of Arizona, to interrogatories, sets numbers 1 and 2. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T18:55:14.899Z |
| 168 | State of Arizona, complainant vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | interrogatories addressed to the complainant, State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 3. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T18:38:03.781Z |
| 169 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | order of special master. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party | 2017-05-19T18:29:54.693Z |
| 170 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | answers of the State of Arizona to interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants, set no. 1. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Moeur, John H, Frank, John P. (John Paul), 1917-2002, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T18:26:29.134Z |
| 171 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party | answer of the State of Nevada to the appearance and statement in behalf of New Mexico of its claim of interest in and to Lower Basin waters. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Kane, William J, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T18:19:13.186Z |
| 172 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for production of documents by the United States of America. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T18:15:27.525Z |
| 173 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants to require further answers of the State of New Mexico to interrogatories, and brief of the California defendants in support thereof. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T18:08:24.294Z |
| 174 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, intervener : State of Utah, intervener | answer of the State of Nevada to complaint and answer in intervention by the State of Utah. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Kane, William J, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, intervener, Utah, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T17:55:09.012Z |
| 175 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | notice of supplemental motion, and supplemental motion of the California defendants to strike certain exhibits introduced by the complainant, State of Arizona. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T17:08:29.987Z |
| 176 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party | answer of California defendants to appearance and statement in behalf of New Mexico of its claim of interest in and to Lower Basin waters, and : interrogatories addressed to the State of New Mexico by the California defendants. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T16:58:01.773Z |
| 177 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | statement of the issues as submitted by the California defendants for the Pre-trial Conference at San Francisco April 10-13, 1956. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States. Supreme Court, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party | 2017-05-19T16:43:57.18Z |
| 178 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | interrogatories addressed to the intervener, the State of Nevada, by the California defendants. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T16:26:29.375Z |
| 179 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for production of document by the State of Arizona. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T16:18:56.574Z |
| 180 | State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party | statement of the State of Nevada. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Dickerson, Harvey, Mathews, William Thomas, 1885-1969, Kane, William J, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T16:12:38.34Z |
| 181 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | interrogatories addressed to the intervener, the United States of America, by the California defendants : set no. 2. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T16:05:15.732Z |
| 182 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | amended answers of the State of Arizona to interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants, sets no. 1 and no. 2 and answers to set no. 3. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Moeur, John H, Frank, John P, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, Akin, Wayne M, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court, Arizona Interstate Stream Commission | 2017-05-19T15:57:18.574Z |
| 183 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for an order relating to rights of the parties to interview government officials and employees. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T15:52:25.343Z |
| 184 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | interrogatories addressed to the intervener, the United States of America, by the California defendants : set no. 1. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H.|q(Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G.|q(Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt,|d1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T15:17:32.936Z |
| 185 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | pre-trial order. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, special master, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T15:09:32.189Z |
| 186 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties | memorandum of April 9, 1956 concerning statement of issues : statement of position of Arizona. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T15:05:53.536Z |
| 187 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | request of the California defendants for admissions. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, party, Utah, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T15:02:31.045Z |
| 188 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State of New Mexico, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | interrogatories addressed to complainant, State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 2. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Lagerlof, Stanley C, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Utah, party, New Mexico, party, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T14:55:32.337Z |
| 189 | In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | answers of the State of Arizona to interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants, set no. 2. | 1956 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Moeur, John H, Frank, John P, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, Akin, Wayne M, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.),| efendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court, Arizona Interstate Stream Commission | 2017-05-19T14:47:46.331Z |
| 190 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener | response of the States of Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico to motion of the United States of America for determination of questions of law prior to determination of joinder motion. | 1955 | Arizona, complainant, Callister, E. R, McCarthy, Dennis, Robinson, Richard, Wilson, Fred E, Dunbar, Duke W, Chilson, Hatfield, Guy, George F, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T14:28:34.486Z |
| 191 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener | petition for rehearing of decision denying motion to join the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. | 1955 | Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Higgins, Shelley J, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T14:17:33.981Z |
| 192 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded, before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | tentative outline of witnesses for Arizona. | 1955 | Arizona, complainant, Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Moeur, John H, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T14:09:57.366Z |
| 193 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener | reply of California defendants to Arizona's memorandum filed November 1, 1955, directed to the report of the special master. | 1955 | Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Brody, George, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Higgins, Shelley J, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T14:05:55.016Z |
| 194 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener | memorandum of the California defendants in reply to motion of the United States for determination of questions of law presented by the pleadings in this cause and the report of the special master. | 1955 | Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Brody, George, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Higgins, Shelley J, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-19T13:54:36.935Z |
| 195 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener | reply brief of the California defendants in support of their motion to join, as parties, the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. | 1955 | Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Gindler, Burton J, Wheatley, Charles F, Norris, William Albert, 1927-, Friedman, Howard I, Jenney, Francis E, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Higgins, Shelley J, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-18T21:29:13.805Z |
| 196 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener | exceptions of the California defendants to the report and recommendations of the special master with respect to their motion to join the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, and brief in support of exceptions. | 1955 | Arizona, complainant, Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, McCarty, Robert L, Moore, Prentiss, Nelson, Gilbert F, Corker, Charles E, Friedman, Howard I, Gindler, Burton J, McKenney, James B, Alexander, John R, Brody, George, Wheatley, Charles F, Jenney, Francis E, Horton, Harry W, Knox, R. L, Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H, Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M, Patten, Alan, Doherty, Frank P, Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H, Du Paul, J. F, Higgins, Shelley J, Cosgrove, T. B, Keller, James Don, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-18T21:05:34.356Z |
| 197 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded: before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master | opening statement of Mr. John H. Moeur, chief counsel, Arizona Interstate Stream Commission. | 1955 | Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995, Moeur, John H, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, Arizona Interstate Stream Commission, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-18T20:57:23.503Z |
| 198 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : states of New Mexico and Utah, impleaded | statement of position of Arizona. | 1955 | Arizona, complainant, Moeur, John H, John P. (John Paul), 1917-2002, Will, John Geoffrey, Sutter, Burr, Ling, Perry M, Kiendl, Theodore, Morrison, Robert, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, impleaded defendant, Utah, impleaded defendant, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-18T20:52:33.005Z |
| 199 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener | special master's report on the motion of the California defendants to join as parties the states of New Mexico, Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming. | 1955 | Arizona | 2017-05-18T20:40:52.671Z |
| 200 | State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.] defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener | appearance and statement in behalf of New Mexico of its claim of interest in and to Lower Basin waters. | 1955 | Arizona, complainant, Robinson, Richard H, Wilson, Fred E, California, defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant, Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant, Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant, San Diego (Calif.), defendant, San Diego County (Calif.), defendant, United States, intervener, Nevada, intervener, New Mexico, United States. Supreme Court | 2017-05-18T20:12:12.831Z |