Arizona v. California

1 to 200 of 233 Objects
(1 - 200 of 233)

Pages

Transcripts of Special Proceedings : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : 1. Oral Argument : Joinder Motion : Dec. 8, 1955 -- 2. Minutes, New York Meeting : Jan. 30, 1956 -- 3. Discussion of Pre-trial Order : April 21, 1956, Arizona v. Calif
Transcripts of Special Proceedings : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : 1. Oral Argument : Joinder Motion : Dec. 8, 1955 -- 2. Minutes, New York Meeting : Jan. 30, 1956 -- 3. Discussion of Pre-trial Order : April 21, 1956, Arizona v. Calif
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, August 27, 1958, Thursday, August 28, 1958 (v. 43 [v. 130 – 131], pp. 22,114-22,593), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 22, 1958, Tuesday, August 26, 1958 (v. 42 [v. 128 – 129], pp. 21,713-22,113), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 19, 1958, Wednesday, August 20, 1958, Thursday, August 21, 1958 (v. 41 [v. 125 – 126 – 127], pp. 21,107-21,712), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 14, 1958, Friday, August 15, 1958, Monday, August 18, 1958 (v. 40 [v. 122 – 123 – 124], pp. 20,514-21,106), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Saturday, July 12, 1958, Monday, July 14, 1958, Tuesday, July 15, 1958 (v. 38 [v. 116 – 117 – 118], pp. 19,428-19,986), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, July 9, 1958, Thursday, July 10, 1958, Friday, July 11, 1958 (v. 37 [v. 113 – 114 – 115], pp. 18,908-19,427), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 3, 1958, Monday, July 7, 1958, Tuesday, July 8, 1958 (v. 36 [v. 110 – 111 – 112], pp. 18,345-18,907), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, May 19, 1958, Tuesday, July 1, 1958, Wednesday, July 2, 1958 (v. 35 [v. 107 – 108 – 109], pp. 17,781-18,344), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, May 14, 1958, Thursday, May 15, 1958, Friday, May 16, 1958 (v. 34 [v. 104 – 105 – 106], pp. 17,248-17,780), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, May 9, 1958, Monday, May 12, 1958, Tuesday, May 13, 1958 (v. 33 [v. 101 – 102 – 103], pp. 16,689-17,247), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, May 6, 1958, Wednesday, May 7, 1958, Thursday, May 8, 1958 (v. 32 [v. 98 – 99 – 100], pp. 16,168-16,688), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, May 2, 1958, Saturday, May 3, 1958, Monday, May 5, 1958 (v. 31 [v. 95 – 96 – 97], pp. 15,639-16,167), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, January 15, 1958, Thursday, January 16, 1958, Friday, January 17, 1958 (v. 30 [v. 92 – 93 – 94], pp. 15,178-15,638), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Te
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, January 10, 1958, Monday, January 13, 1958, Tuesday, January 14, 1958 (v. 29 [v. 89 – 90 – 91], pp. 14,662-15,177), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, January 7, 1958, Wednesday, January 8, 1958, Thursday, January 9, 1958 (v. 28 [v. 86 – 87 – 88], pp. 14,126-14,661), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 22, 1957, Friday, August 23, 1957, Monday, January 6, 1958 (v. 27 [v. 83 – 84 – 85], pp. 13,611-14,125), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, August 19, 1957, Tuesday, August 20, 1957, Wednesday, August 21, 1957 (v. 26 [v. 80 – 81 – 82], pp. 13,145-13,610; Includes Conference of Tuesday, August 20, 1957), Arizona
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, August 14, 1957, Thursday, August 15, 1957, Friday, August 16, 1957 (v. 25 [v. 77 – 78 – 79], pp. 12,604-13,144), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 9, 1957, Monday, August 12, 1957, Tuesday, August 13, 1957 (v. 24 [v. 74 – 75 – 76], pp. 12,072-12,603), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 6, 1957, Wednesday, August 7, 1957, Thursday, August 8, 1957 (v. 23 [v. 71 – 72 – 73], pp. 11,510-12,071), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 18, 1957, Friday, July 19, 1957, Monday, August 5, 1957 (v. 22 [v. 68 – 69 – 70], pp. 11,015-11,509), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, July 15, 1957, Tuesday, July 16, 1957, Wednesday, July 17, 1957 (v. 21 [v. 65 – 66 – 67], pp. 10,500-11,014A), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, July 10, 1957, Thursday, July 11, 1957, Friday, July 12, 1957 (v. 20 [v. 62 – 63 – 64], pp. 9930-10,499), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Saturday, July 6, 1957, Monday, July 8, 1957, Tuesday, July 9, 1957 (v. 19 [v. 59 – 60 – 61], pp. 9449-9929), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, July 2, 1957, Wednesday, July 3, 1957, Friday, July 5, 1957 (v. 18 [v. 56 – 57 – 58], pp. 8895-9448), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, May 16, 1957, Friday, May 17, 1957, Monday, July 1, 1957 (v. 17 [v. 53 – 54 – 55], pp. 8406-8894), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, May 13, 1957, Tuesday, May 14, 1957, Wednesday, May 15, 1957 (v. 16 [v. 50 – 51 – 52], pp. 7919-8405), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, May 8, 1957, Thursday, May 9, 1957, Friday, May 10, 1957 (v. 15 [v. 47 – 48 – 49], pp. 7426-7918), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, February 15, 1957, Monday, May 6, 1957, Tuesday, May 7, 1957 (v. 14 [v. 44 – 45 – 46], pp. 6934-7425), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, February 11, 1957, Tuesday, February 12, 1957, Wednesday, February 13, 1957, Thursday, February 14, 1957 (v. 13 [v. 40 – 41 – 42 - 43], pp. 6304-6933), Arizona v. California
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, August 21, 1956, Wednesday, August 22, 1956, Thursday, August 23, 1956, Friday, August 24, 1956, Monday, August 27, 1956 (v. 12 [v. 35–36–37- 38 - 39], pp. 5676-6303), Ariz
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, August 16, 1956, Friday, August 17, 1956, Monday, August 20, 1956 (v. 11 [v. 32 – 33 – 34], pp. 5156-5675-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
 Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Friday, August 3, 1956, Monday, August 13, 1956, Tuesday, August 14, 1956, Wednesday, August 15, 1956 (v. 10 [v. 28 – 29 – 30 - 31], pp. 4707-5155-A), Arizona v. California, No. [1
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, July 31, 1956, Wednesday, August 1, 1956, Thursday, August 2, 1956 (v. 9 [v. 25 – 26 – 27], pp. 4172-4706), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, July 26, 1956, Friday, July 27, 1956, Monday, July 30, 1956 (v. 8 [v. 22 – 23 – 24], pp. 3654-4171), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, July 23, 1956, Tuesday, July 24, 1956, Wednesday, July 25, 1956 (v. 7 [v. 19 – 20 – 21], pp. 3136-3653-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, July 18, 1956, Thursday, July 19, 1956, Friday, July 20, 1956 (v. 6 [v. 16 – 17 – 18], pp. 2638-3135-A), Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, July 3, 1956, Thursday, July 5, 1956, Friday, July 6, 1956 (v. 5 [v. 13 – 14 – 15], pp. 2063-2637), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, June 28, 1956, Friday, June 29, 1956, Monday, July 2, 1956 (v. 4 [v. 10 – 11 – 12], pp. 1551-2062), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Monday, June 25, 1956, Tuesday, June 26, 1956, Wednesday, June 27, 1956 (v. 3 [v. 7 – 8 – 9], pp. 1049-1550-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Wednesday, June 20, 1956, Thursday, June 21, 1956, Friday, June 22, 1956 (v. 2 [v. 4 – 5 – 6], pp. 533-1048-A), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, October Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Thursday, June 14, 1956, Friday, June 15, 1956, Tuesday, June 19, 1956 (v. 1 [v. 1 – 2 – 3], pp. 1-532), Arizona v. California, No. [10], Original, 1955 Term.
Reporters’ Transcript : Pre Trial Conference : Before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master, Tuesday, April 10 - Friday, April 13, 1956, Arizona v. California, No. 10.
Transcripts of Special Proceedings: Before the Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master
Transcript of New York Hearings, New York, NY, August 17, 1960 (Southern District Court Reporters), Before Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: Stenographer’s Minutes
Oral Arguments on Defendants’ Motion to Join, as Parties, the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, Before George I. Haight, Special Master, Stenographic Transcript, Vol. 1
Motion on Behalf of Navajo Tribe of Indians of the Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, for Leave to Intervene, Brief in Support Thereof, and Petition of Intervention
Affadavit of Services
New Mexico's Exceptions to the Report and Recommended Decree of the Special Master
Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Recommended Decree on File Herein, Dated December 5, 1960, Filed by Defendant, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, on Its Behalf and on Behalf of Its Co-Defendants, The City of Los Ang
Memorandum of the California Defendants in Reply to Memorandum of the United States Requesting a Pre-Trial Conference
Answer of Complainant of Arizona to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the State of Nevada
Answer of California Defendants to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the United States of America and Summary of the Controversy (Exhibit A)
Complainant's Objections to Motion on Behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for Leave to File Petition to Intervene
Motion of Colter Water Project Ass'n, Inc. for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curaie
Motion on Behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for Leave to File Petition to Intervene
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : Colorado River Indian Tribes ... [et al.], recomm
Arizona v. California et al. : no. 8, original : Decree carrying into effect this Court’s opinion of June 3, 1963, 373 U.S. 546.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1963, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
[State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, no. 8 original, October term 1963 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1963, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded
Arizona v. California et al. : on exceptions to special master's report and recommended decree : no. 8, original.
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, an
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1963 : no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Wate
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San D
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, an
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, an
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener: State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. state of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al.
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San D
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al.
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special ma
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, an
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San D
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
Upper Colorado River Commission summary : no. 9 original, in the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1959 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valle
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San D
Water supply of the Lower Colorado River Basin : extracts from brief and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, submitted April 1, 1959, to Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master, by the California defendants and excerpts from the evidence, Ariz
Arizona v. California : no. 9 original, October 1959 term
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special mas
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special mas
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special maste
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special mas
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties: before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special ma
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special ma
United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Wat
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Wat
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, intervenors : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special mas
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State of New Mexico, party
Recommendations of the California defendants regarding the proposed pre-trial order : IIB. maps : Arizona v. California.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special ma
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [el al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State of New Mexico, party
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, a
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan W
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
State of Arizona, plaintiff, vs. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special ma
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, party, State of Utah, party
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, intervener : State of Utah, intervener
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Wate
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Wate
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Wate
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and C
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded: before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : states of New Mexico and Utah, impleaded
State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.] defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener

Pages